We have an interesting statement in the Hislop's book:
"...........It was no mere astronomic festival, then, that the Pagans celebrated at the winter solstice. That festival at Rome was called the feast of Saturn, and the mode in which it was celebrated there, showed whence it had been derived. The feast, as regulated by Caligula, lasted five days; * loose reins were given to drunkenness and revelry, slaves had a temporary emancipation, ** and used all manner of freedoms with their masters.
* Subsequently the number of the days of the Saturnalia was increased to seven. See JUSTUS LIPSIUS, Opera, tom. ii, Saturnal lib. i. cap. 4.
** If Saturn, or Kronos, was, as we have seen reason to believe, Phoroneus, "The emancipator," the "temporary emancipation" of the slaves at his festival was exactly in keeping with his supposed character.............." [The Two Babylons, chapter CHRISTMAS AND LADY-DAY]
Keep also in mind Tertullian (also quoted by Hislop in the beginning of the above mentioned chapter), about the disastrous influence of pagan customs on the strenghten of the Faith:
"......Nor is the Nativity included in the feasts recognized by Irenaeus or Tertullian (On Baptism, XIX), who admonishes Christians in his treatise On Idolatry not to partake in the Saturnalia, or gift-giving at the new year or midwinter, or "an idol's birthday" when "every pomp of the devil is frequented" (X). "The Saturnalia and New-year's and Midwinter's festivals and Matronalia are frequented—presents come and go—New-year's gifts—games join their noise—banquets join their din!" (XIV). Just as the heathen does not celebrate the Lord's Day (Sunday) or Pentecost, so Christians should not partake in their festivals; rather, they have a festive day every week whereas pagans celebrate only once a year. "When the world rejoices, let us grieve; and when the world afterward grieves, we shall rejoice" (XIII)........" [ http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/invictus.html ]
Probably you are now already accustomed with the evident pagan fraudulent taking possession of the symbol and of the religious significance of the Noah's Dove, to tame it and transform it in an obedient bird at the service of the imperial pagan roman system.
And what else have we now? I bring such information in order to not be ambiguous. Again the Sol Invictus:
".........In the Julian reform of the Roman calendar, December 25, the eighth day after the Kalends of January (VIII Kal. Jan.), was recognized as the winter solstice.............." [source as abovehttp://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/invictus.html ]
And the Julian calendar:
"........The Julian calendar, introduced by Julius Caesar in 46 BC (708 AUC), was a reform of the Roman calendar. It took effect in 45 BC (709 AUC). It was the predominant calendar in most of Europe, and in European settlements in the Americas and elsewhere, until it was refined and superseded by the Gregorian calendar. The difference in the length of the year between Julian (365.25 days) and Gregorian (365.2425 days) is 0.002%..........." [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_calendar ]
Therefore it is confirmed that after Caligula the Saturnalia was brought up to seven days and that the Sol Invictus birthday was the day 25. No doubts on it:
Well keep in mind the days from 17 to 23 december.... And now a question of branches of trees - still from Hislop's book [The Two Babylons, chapter CHRISTMAS AND LADY-DAY] :"........
Saturnalia was an ancient Roman festival in honor of the deity Saturn, held on December 17 of the Julian calendar and later expanded with festivities through December 23. The holiday was celebrated with a sacrifice at the Temple of Saturn, in the Roman Forum, and a public banquet, followed by private gift-giving, continual partying, and a carnival atmosphere that overturned Roman social norms: gambling was permitted, and masters provided table service for their slaves.[1] The poet Catullus called it "the best of days."[2]
........." [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturnalia ]
"......And this entirely accounts for the putting of the Yule Log into the fire on Christmas-eve, and the appearance of the Christmas-tree the next morning. As Zero-Ashta, "The seed of the woman," which name also signified Ignigena, or "born of the fire," he has to enter the fire on "Mother-night," that he may be born the next day out of it, as the "Branch of God," or the Tree that brings all divine gifts to men.........".Further in a note, Hislop says:
"........* In the Scandinavian story of Balder, the mistletoe branch is distinguished from the lamented god. The Druidic and Scandinavian myths somewhat differed; but yet, even in the Scandinavian story, it is evident that some marvellous power was attributed to the mistletoe branch; for it was able to do what nothing else in the compass of creation could accomplish; it slew the divinity on whom the Anglo-Saxons regarded "the empire" of their "heaven" as "depending." Now, all that is necessary to unravel this apparent inconsistency, is just to understand "the branch" that had such power, as a symbolical expression for the true Messiah..........."
Well, the Noah's Dove with a leaf of olive tree today is a dove with a branch of olive tree.... again a pagan-satanist allegory of the true Messiah? See the dove logo of the International World Peace day - the 1st January:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:International_Peace_Day_logo.jpg
The olive branch - the Yule Log - the mistletoe branch???.......
2013-01-01 Vatican Radio
......(Vatican Radio) The Catholic Church marks the World Day of Peace each January 1st. In his 2013 message for the day, entitled “Blessed are the Peacemakers,” Pope Benedict XVI says peace is possible in today’s world but everyone must work together as a family to achieve it. ...."
URL: http://www.news.va/en/news/pope-on-world-day-of-peace-2013-blessed-are-the-pe
Well, could it be that the pagans/satanists forced the Ark's Dove to bring the branch/Sol Invictus on the eve of 25th December? Just take in mind those seven days of Saturnalia, ending just with the day 23.... Where else did you hear about seven days?...Maybe the days of waiting of Noah on the Ark before another attempt with the dove???....
Yeah you right.... the first time Noah waited seven days before to make another attempt with the Dove.... If the second attempt can be considered as falling on the eight day, pagans and satanists have now a timing of a Dove which comes back with a leaf or a part of a branch, just after the Saturnalia's seven days and before the Sol Invictus birthday.....too inviting for them in order to not manipulate and degrade it....
Confusion in your head? No problem, just now only give a look to the interesting coincidences of timelines, the one of the Noah's attempts with the dove and the one of the roman heathen feasts of December, coinciding with the Roman Catholic Christmas/New Year Feast....(suggestion, take in hand Genesis chapter 8, if you dont have one i reported it in References):
Overlay now the timing of the Noah's attempt with the dove and the Saturnalia/Sol Invictus/Christmas timings - the frame is the common month of December:
Summary: with the day 16 the Dove comes back without leaves, empty beak:
Now Noah waiting seven days, therefore from the next sequent day 17 to the day 23, and are exactly seven days the Roman satanists declared "Saturnalia":".........
8 Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground;
9 But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark.
............"
".........10 And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark;.........."
If he "stayed other seven days" I argue he sent forth the dove on the eight day, therefore on the eve of the Sol Invictus' birthday, the day 24. But it was a short flight. Right in the same evening the Dove comes back with the leaf (then in the pagan-satanist imagination grown till the dimension of a branch)....bringing the Sol Invictus?....:
"......11 And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth........."
...."and Noah knew the waters were abated", another biblical event distorted, manipulated and forced to serve idolatry.... Ok, he now starts again to wait, logically beginning with the sequent day, the 25 of the birthday....:
"........12 And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent forth the dove; which returned not again unto him any more................".
.....to try another attempt only after the seven days of pause..... 25,.... 26,..... 27,...... 28,...... 29,..... 30,...... 31, end! And which is the day when he for the third time sends the Dove, but it never again comes back as his legs found a soil where to rest????
Exactly in the International World Peace day on 1st January whose logo is a "dove with a branch" (see above picture with URL)......
Obvious - for the heathens - that the legs of the dove rested and 'consecrated' the pagan soil of Babylon, Egypt, Rome,... but this has just been explained in two previous posts (see below the links).
...........
Below you can find a little scheme I created to help the understanding. I hope to have made not too much errors in my analysis:
Related posts: "Obsessed with the Flood - I" and "Supersessionist dove - appendix":
Friday, January 3, 2014
Supersessionist dove - appendix.
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/01/supersessionist-dove-appendix.html
Thursday, January 2, 2014
Obsessed with the Flood - I
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/01/obsessed-with-flood-i.html
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/Augur,_Nordisk_familjebok.png/365px-Augur,_Nordisk_familjebok.png
----------------REFERENCES:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+8&version=KJV
Genesis 8
King James Version (KJV)
8 And
God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the cattle that
was with him in the ark: and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and
the waters assuaged;
2 The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained;3 And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated.
4 And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.
5 And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen.
6 And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made:
7 And he sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth.
8 Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground;
9 But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark.
10 And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark;
11 And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth.
12 And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent forth the dove; which returned not again unto him any more.
13 And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry.
14 And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried.
15 And God spake unto Noah, saying,
16 Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee.
17 Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.
18 And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him:
19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.
20 And Noah builded an altar unto the Lord; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.
21 And the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.
22 While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.
They fit everything ....
ReplyDeleteTerry pratchet Satanic imagination?:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropomorphic_personifications_%28Discworld%29#The_Hogfather
From the book "Sumerian myths in Bulgarian folklore"
"Swine" is the first month of the year Eresh-ki-gal is a Goddess associated with the swine. In Turkish domuz = swine(TAMMUZ?)
The planet GAGA = KAKA is PLUTO !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1f-H9bfqk
Swine = capricorn(december/January)= pluto
NinSHUBURA (another name of Ereshkigal) = "shopar" means swine in bulgarian
As Dumuzi, circa 3000 BC, Nimrod carried on a sexually filthy relationship with Inanna, who is Semiramis renamed.
Sorry, here it is:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=lady+gaga+swine&sm=3
Lady Gaga lyrics
"You're just a pig inside
Do ya I know I know I know I know you want me
Your just a pig inside a human body
Squealer squealer squeal out you're so disgusting
You're just a pig inside"
The author of the aforementioned book (bulgarian guy) is influenced by Sitchin, but he clearly shows the Sumerian(Babylonian) origin of bulgarian folklore.
The pig as a symbol of Nimrod, Tammuz and Semiramis(like the dove) makes me think why the LEGION entered the swine = coincidence or not?
Interesting book, showing many of the orthodox "saints" are nothing more than pagan gods of Sumer, Assyria, Babylon.
""Swine" is the first month of the year Eresh-ki-gal is a Goddess associated with the swine. In Turkish domuz = swine(TAMMUZ?)"
ReplyDeleteIt linked but not the same character.. Here what reports Hislop about the swine etc.:
".......In many countries the boar was sacrificed to the god, for the injury a boar was fabled to have done him. According to one version of the story of the death of Adonis, or Tammuz, it was, as we have seen, in consequence of a wound from the tusk of a boar that he died. The Phrygian Attes, the beloved of Cybele, whose story was identified with that of Adonis, was fabled to have perished in like
manner, by the tusk of a boar. Therefore, Diana, who though commonly represented in popular myths only as the huntress Diana, was in reality the great mother of the gods, has frequently the boar's head as her accompaniment,..............".
The boar (swine?) killing one of those pagan 'hereos' seems to be more a re-elaboration of Shem killing Nimrod, where Shem is transformed in a boar in order to mock his figure, and the idolater satanist Nimrod is the "hero". In another point there's pointed out an allegorical difference, the horn of Nimrod as symbol of physical power and the purposely mocked power of persuasion, spiritual one, represented by the "horn in the mouth" related to Shem...(my capital charcts):
".....In connection with this character of Shem, the myth that makes Adonis, who is identified with Osiris, perish by the tusks of a wild boar, is easily unravelled. *.............,.........The bull's horns that Nimrod wore were the symbol of PHYSICAL power. The boar's tusks were the symbol of SPIRITUAL power. As a "horn" means power, so a tusk, that is, a horn in the mouth, means "power in the mouth"; in other words, the power of persuasion; the very power with which "Sem," the primitive Hercules, was so signally endowed. Even from the ancient traditions of the Gael, we get an item of evidence that at once illustrates this idea of power in the mouth, and connects it with that great son of Noah, on whom the blessing of the Highest, as recorded in Scripture, did specially rest..............".
Yes thanks for having noted this a contradiction in apparence, i think Jesus allowed LEGION to enter the swines first in order to exhibit to anyone the relity of DEMONS with the collective death of 2000 animals a fact which remained impressed just only for the economical damage.... but look from the other side the question... LEGION asked to enter in the swines, Jesus only allowed to that .... you can always interpret this as a pedagogy Jesus allowed in to show what happens to us if we allow the Evil enter in us.... at the end of all those swines on the hill were victims who participated without awareness to their tragedy.... if swines were symbol of Nimrod LEGION would have (following logic) aimed them against the spectators.... pigs, swines, etc. are not chihuaua and they can be dangerous to men...
ReplyDelete"Eresh-ki-gal is a Goddess associated with the swine."....
ReplyDeleteHislop present a fact beyond any doubt about female figures and swines:
"........In many countries the boar was sacrificed to the god, for the injury a boar was fabled to have done him. According to one version of the story of the death of Adonis, or Tammuz, it was, as we have seen, in consequence of a wound from the tusk of a boar that he died. The Phrygian Attes, the beloved of Cybele, whose story was identified with that of Adonis, was fabled to have perished in like
manner, by the tusk of a boar. Therefore, Diana, who though commonly represented in popular myths only as the huntress Diana, was in reality the great mother of the gods, has frequently the boar's head as her accompaniment, in token not of any mere success in the chase, but of her triumph over the grand enemy of the idolatrous system, in which she occupied so conspicuous a place.According to Theocritus, Venus was reconciled to the boar that killed Adonis, because when brought in chains before her, it pleaded so pathetically that it had not killed her husband of malice prepense, but only through accident.........."
".....The pig as a symbol of Nimrod, Tammuz and Semiramis(like the dove) makes me think why the LEGION entered the swine = coincidence or not? ........"
ReplyDeleteIf you look well you see that here there only an APPARENT problem, i.e. if sometimes the same character appears at the same time with opposite features in different countries... The Babylonian system since 4500 yrs is based on the secret and not always it was assured - as regard his infinite duplications - a complete alignment with the original model of Babylon. ... I can guess that a perfect world-wide harmony was even NOT favored by the same Cushites and this in order to hide the secret core (today Masonry, occult, esoteric, etc.) under a Chaos of apparent contradictory significances... Chaos comes from CUSH or KHUS whose significance is "cup" (see Revelation with Lady with Cup in hand), aka "the hidden one" as the cup at the same time "hides" the content... of course the usual common significance of chaos (confusion, absence of order) is just identifying that "hidden" guy, using his dialectical opposite, the confusion which hides the below lying secret order of significance.
Hislop simply filtered the chaos of the Pagan Background Radiation to let emerge the signals of Satan. To tell the truth the same Hislop was only the one who gathered and issued what was the common general opinion among explorers, academics and cult ministers truly Christian protestant in the British Islands of his age
In the post i forgot to point out better the concept of the BRANCH, under....
ReplyDelete"........Well, the Noah's Dove with a leaf of olive tree today is a dove with a branch of olive tree.... again a pagan-satanist allegory of the true Messiah? See the dove logo of the International World Peace day - the 1st January:.....[picture dove branch olive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:International_Peace_Day_logo.jpg]...... The olive branch - the Yule Log - the mistletoe branch???............."
....it is to read the sequent excerpt from The Two Babylons:
".....The mother of Adonis, the Sun-God and great mediatorial divinity, was mystically said to have been changed into a tree, and when in that state to have brought forth her divine son. If the mother was a tree, the son must have been recognised as the "Man the branch.".......(.....).....As Zero-Ashta, "The seed of the woman," which name also signified Ignigena, or "born of the fire," he has to enter the fire on "Mother-night," that he may be born the next day out of it, as the "Branch of God," or the Tree that brings all divine gifts to men........".
"....The mother of Adonis, the Sun-God and great mediatorial divinity, was mystically said to have been changed into a tree......." [ a. Hislop ]
ReplyDeleteOk, let's filter from the khus of the Pagan/Roman Background Radiation the signals of Satan:
The dove flying from the Ark, arrives where is lying (allegedly on a not submerged top of a mount - see allegory with Babel's tower which can "save" humanity from God's wrath) Adonis' mom pregnant of previously killed husband (Nimrod), the dove take the Son (born before the time see again Hislop) and bring it back (the olive leaf become a "branch") to Noah before the landing and the sacrifice and the declaration of Covenant of God with Noah (Gen 9:9).... in this way Satan allude that in the Flood it survived not only Noah's family but also the MOTHER OF GOD and the Covenant is blessing the MOTHER OF GOD & "MAN THE BRANCH" .... In fact see the first January, the day is consecrated to the SS Mary Mother of God (and it consistent with the third consecration of planet earth to the same immaculate conceived Mary by that Jesuit guy in Vatican in 2013, as yo pointed out in a previous comment).
The branch is an interesting symbol. It seems we have here another copy of Jesus Christ, the branch of David:
ReplyDeleteJeremiah 33:15 In those days, and at that time, will I cause the Branch of righteousness to grow up unto David; and he shall execute judgment and righteousness in the land.
Isaiah 11:1 And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots:
Isaiah 6:13
But yet in it shall be a tenth, and it shall return, and shall be eaten: as a teil tree, and as an oak, whose substance is in them, when they cast their leaves: so the holy seed shall be the substance thereof.
The remnant of Israel that the Lord will bring into his Millenial kingdom(yay, no more Satan)is grown out of a healthy root. Us, the gentiles(pagans) are grafted in it by faith:
Romans 11:
17 And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;
18 Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.
20 Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.
24 For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?
25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
Incidentally, Martin Luther and other "churches" boasted against the branches (antisemitism) which led to their demise - Supersessionism is hatred toward the original branches of the tree. It is somewhat logical that Luther would think that the Jews are out of the picture, because too many Jews sided with Catholicism and the situation was such, but still...... God will regraft the original branches some day. Not until the Church(bride) of Christ is complete by the redeemed pagans.
It seems the OAK tree has a negative image in the Bible:
Isaiah 1:29
For they shall be ashamed of the oaks which ye have desired, and ye shall be confounded for the gardens that ye have chosen.
Isiah 1:30 For ye shall be as an oak whose leaf fadeth, and as a garden that hath no water.
Zechariah 11:2
Howl, fir tree; for the cedar is fallen; because the mighty are spoiled: howl, O ye oaks of Bashan; for the forest of the vintage is come down.
The oaks of Bashan point to the bulls of Bashan in the prophetic psalm 22
Psalms 22:12
Many bulls have compassed me: strong bulls of Bashan have beset me round.
It seems it has to do with the unclean spirits that the Lord defeated at the cross at Golgotha(the place of the skull)
Colossians 2:15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
Ephesians 6:12
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Again, Satan was defeated.
The oak is farnese in italian from discussions in the Unhived Mind
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Paul_III
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Farnese
And these are the folks that put the Jesuits in power.
The Christmas tree, Santa, doves and pigs,"Snow White girl" is the same pagan circus as Hislop stated. Of course the elves are the spirits/fallen angels that help Satan create his "gifts" - works salvations for all world religions.
"......Incidentally, Martin Luther and other "churches" boasted against the branches (antisemitism) which led to their demise - Supersessionism is hatred toward the original branches of the tree. It is somewhat logical that Luther would think that the Jews are out of the picture, because too many Jews sided with Catholicism and the situation was such, but still......"
ReplyDeleteyes because i believe in my limited knowledge of the matter that he wanted to reform the church of Rome not to deny her. The term "reformation" is ambiguous, so he mostly created a model of a church competing with the original Roman one, than to come back to true original Christianity. He was an evolutionist and conserved much of the "catholic civiliziation" or many theological points of the first "fathers" of the Romish church who "emancipated the church" from the "primitive Christendom"......He conserved the Romish fundamentals (the supersessionism, the replacement, etc.), at the same time he wanted to change the consequence of those fundamentals of pagan Roman Catholicism ,the works as salvation etc ... But yo cannot eliminate the consequences without to eliminate the causes....you cannot reform in the name of the New Testament meanwhile you have the same attitude of your enemies towards Old Testament.... he did that of course more for reason of competition with Rome, being anxious to not appear less anti-Jewish than the Inquisition of Rome in order to gain more support ....
18 Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee....
ReplyDeleteLuther boasting against the natural branches boasted against the root and this ws the great problem of Lutheranism from which never recovered....
I believe the olive LEAF of the Genesis' dove representing the Seed of the woman... Satan ordered his men to take possession of the symbol and to transform it in the pagan branches of Baal etc.
yea not in vain the Saturnalia (from 17 to 23) were held BEFORE the arrival of the dove with olive LEAF today olive BRANCH (evening of 24 dec)... the pagan dove bringing in the New World the seed of the wickedness represented by the orgies of the previous seven day Saturnalia?....
ReplyDeleteIndeed, Luther only created a new religion. To deny the Hebrew nature of the teachings of Jesus Christ and His teachings is very dangerous. God's teachings were NEVER pagan. It's just that the Jews couldn't grasp the inward side of things(uncircumcised heart) and wanted the promises of God without submission. That is the reason of their suffering and future trials. The New Testament becomes the showcase of God's perfection and man's imperfection by the rebukes of Jesus, the giving of the new birth, the permanent indwelling of the Holy Ghost etc. In the book of Hebrews it is clearly seen that the Lord Jesus serves the highest religious role, being the only high priest and only sacrifice and that Judaism is only a shadow of heavenly rituals, a taste of things to come.
ReplyDeleteOf course, God's moral standards never dissappeared (what Luther clearly doesn't understand) and the role of the Covenants with the Jews which God will not just leave behind(no matter if it seems so).
Lutheranism is another dead religion, evidence by its ecumenism and lack of power on people to live as Christians. Luther translated the Bible, but only used it for the establishment of his ideas about the corrupt, but good at the core Catholic church. His progressive opposition to Rome on a theological level is only a result of the political opposition of Rome to Germany etc. He read Scripture for years and translated it, yet at first sided with Catholicism and religious mumbo jumbo. When he was no longer fearful of Rome he started competing with Her.
"....Indeed, Luther only created a new religion. To deny the Hebrew nature of the teachings of Jesus Christ and His teachings is very dangerous. God's teachings were NEVER pagan. ......"
ReplyDeleteYo pointed out a very important fundamental truth, rejecting that Hebrew nature it automatically means God ws on side of pagans/heathens.... but in fact with the pagan manipulation of Eden/Flood etc., the dove, Noah, etc. story Satan want just to inculcate the perversion of an imagined biblical "God" teaching paganism...
And I would also read the tragedy of Eastern Prussia and East Germany were Lutheranism was preponderant also from this perspective.... I think Jesuits of general superior Wladimir Ledochowsky were in awareness of what we say now, and used the heavy errors of Luthers just to make him fall in this trap.... See only how Vatican in Germany little after concordat played the theater of the "Hitler's victim" .....(to distance from him, a Romish guy, in order to not displease most of German protestants, and to induce them in to consider Hitler not on the side of Rome and hence worth to receive their political support? To then be dragged in the extreme consequences of their error by the same church of Rome?)..... Bcause in Rome they are aware that the prince of this world (Satan) is only ONE therefore he admits only ONE headquarter for himself,... Rome,.... and the other must be submitted or be wiped away.... see today's Lutheran church of Norway for example .... a concentrate of supersessionism, replacement, etc. in other words anti-semitism.
Luther needed of political support for him and in that environment, suffucated by the Romish agenda, it was achievable only with heavy, very heavy theological concessions to Rome..... For example you cannot compete with a Romish church if you would not demonstrate even MORE anti-semite than her..... therefore Lutheranism was born just in the cradle suffucated by the political issues (Satan's issues) of that world.... like ancient Nazca who compressed the head of babies in order to get them long at back....
ReplyDeleteThe material on your blogs helped much to understand how the dynamics of politics is nothing more than concealed Satanic pagan Babylonian agenda.
ReplyDeleteBabylon is always a mixed religious/state system. Indeed, because Satan controls the world, you cannot compete with who he has chosen for too long. No human is stronger than Satan here. Only Jesus...and he will take everything by force. With the Jesuits Satan has consolidated his power very quickly.So the appearence of Luther and the Bible in German and English only gave strength and more power to Satan. With the centuries the Babylonian system has developed in a Chameleon that is hidden behind ideologies, policies. It cannot prevail against the Word of God so it resorts to the extremes of punishment using the state or, more frequently in its modern chameleon form the appeal to peoples emotions and vain imaginations by ideology(which is their sinful rebellion against God in actuallity) I believe just as God has an original plan(Garden of Eden) Satan has too, and it is the before flood horrible scene of complete wickedness. The Anarchists, In my opinion are influenced by pre-flood nostalgia(very good term you coined) by spirits too.
Behind the paravan, Rome are preparing a person who will not be a polititian or a "leader" in the sense of the traditional perception of the term. I have no doubt the popes picture a type of the antichrist as does certain figures in certain aspects - Hitler, the presidents, etc.
The Lutheran and most "reformation" interpretation of prophecy is very limited and I believe the Catholic church to be simply the carrier, the lifeless shell that carries the new religion and the Antichrist. Satan will surely bring about a massive reformation that will skewer things in another direction altogether. This will have to do with the alien agenda. They are putting far too much effort in this to be just another deception. Luther hated the Book of Revelation, because he believed the church(His Church) will win over the world. But we know who the God of this world is. Jesus is coming back to take the world and usher in His kingdom and boy, is he going to be mad!
I believe people generally today are too lazy and unbelieving, they need "signs and wonders" to become fanaticized.The current religions are dead as a vessel of ideology. The same way God told Israel in the desert and afterwards about how He is their God (signs and wonders) Christ and the Apostles offered signs and still the Jews rejected Him, because they were exposed for their sin as a nation.The Jews didn't want a judge, but a giver. That is what the Antichrist will be.
1 Cor 1: 22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:
The papacy has not showed any particular signs thus far(except crying statues etc frauds) and certainly lack of wisdom. But if the Aliens come here this will be a sign of itself and their "ancient wisdom"(no doubt the wisdom of pre-flood wickedness and intermingling of angels and people). will capture the minds of the Greeks(pagans). Everyone wants freedom, so freedom they will get. Especially in the face of the coming end of the world and the evil creator aliens.
Some Scripture pertaining to Liberty, Anarchy and the world end
ReplyDelete2 Peter 2:19
While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.
Look, how the lack of belief in the ressurection breeds amoral behaviour:
let us eat and drink; for to morrow we die.
1 Corinthians 15:32
The prophetic Psalm about Armaggedon:
1Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision.
5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.
6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.
7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.
9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.
10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.
11 Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling.
12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
Verse 12 - this is a mockery that Satan put in Judas' head - "I will kiss him and he won't be angry when I betray him"
Relativism is simply the reversal of God's laws. The "satanists" like Lavey were honest in their beliefs, but this honesty is just a joke of Satan making people think they are not in rebellion against God, that only the "Satanists" are.
Another point worth mentioning is the concept of salvation. Most people believe Jesus is the Savior of the body or saviour of the liberty(false gospels) or saviour of equality. In this role, the Antichrist will fit perfectly, like Nimrod "saved" people from the evil beasts and how "evolutionism" and science save people from god's judgement and the curse of life(disease, discomfort etc.)And Jews want a saviour from the oppression of the heathen.
ReplyDeletein fact Cush/Nimrod were known under the term "the deliverer" "the emancipator" of course of the fear of God
ReplyDelete