Showing posts with label Fred Hoyle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fred Hoyle. Show all posts

Saturday, January 25, 2014

"...a resurgence of Protestant fundamentalism".

>
Above image - the Jesuit logo
Above image - the TRIMURTI of Jesuitical Darwinism: "Original caption: Abbe Georges LeMaitre, youthful Belgian priest who is regarded by the scientific world as one of the half-dozen outstanding experts on Einstein's theory of relativity, is seen here with Dr. Albert Einstein, world-famous scientist, as they conferred at the California Institute of Technology. At left is Robert A. Millikan, head of the Institute. .... date of the photo: 12 January 1933/ Los Angeles" - URL: http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/U211064ACME/albert-einstein-with-robert-millikan-and-georges

Is Darwinism and  Evolutionism simply the atheist strong arm of the Roman Canonic law?



 
"....Above image - "....Georges Lemaître between Robert Millikan (on the left) and Albert Einstein (on the right). The Big Bang theory of the "Primeval Atom" triumphs. California Institute of Technology. Pasadena, 10 January 1933...."
https://www.uclouvain.be/en-316446.html......."


i chose this image because i never realized about it,... i remember always ONLY lemaitre and Einstein (as reported in most sites), but didnt know about the presecnce of the Congregationalist Millikann... So the representavtive of the emperor/Cush at the center (Rome), with a Jew on his left and a 'protestant' on his right side....


".............Millikan joined the Westside Congregational Church where he was elected to the board in 1922 and was instrumental in the 1924 merger with the Pasadena Unitarian Church. Called "The Neighborhood Church," it was a Congregational Church with Unitarian ties until 1972 when the congregation voted to affiliate with the UUA. In 1930, Millikan hired an old Chicago friend, Dr. Theodore Soares, to teach philosophy and Ethics at Caltech. He also served as the minister of the Neighborhood Church.* .......
....In the 1920s there was a resurgence of Protestant fundamentalism in the United States, including opposition to the theory of evolution. When Robert E. Brown, his brother-in-law and a Congregationalist minister, called on him to organize the scientific community in support of evolution, Millikan drew up a statement, which Noyes revised, that was signed by leading scientists, intellectuals, and community leaders including the Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover.


Millikan elaborated his views on science and religion in a 1927 lecture series at Yale that was later issued in book form as Evolution in Science and Religion, 1927.
That same year he was the subject of a cover story in Time magazine. According to Time, he believed that "science dominated by the spirit of religion is the key to progress and the hope of mankind." These views were consistent with his belief in redemptive power of hard work by God-fearing Americans. Millikan lectured, was a guest on radio programs, and wrote articles for Atlantic and Colliers. The advent of home appliances and modern synthetic fabrics made the words of scientists magical to the public. In the popular 1931 book, Living Philosophies, he and 21 other "thinkers" shared their beliefs.
.......
The Millikans continued to live in San Marino, California after his retirement. They attended the Neighborhood Unitarian Universalist Church of Pasadena where Robert had served on the church board and as congregation president. ....
......
.....Millikan passionately believed that evolution and science were combined in a fundamental way. Near the end of his career he wrote that, "while the Great Architect had to direct the early stages of the evolutionary process, that part of him that becomes us . . . has been stepping up amazingly the pace of . . . evolution since we began to become conscious of the part we had to play. It is our sense of responsibility for playing our part to the best of our ability that makes us Godlike." ........".

And from Wikipedia...: 

".....A religious man and the son of a minister, in his later life Millikan argued strongly for a complementary relationship between Christian faith and science.[14][15][16][17] He dealt with this in his Terry Lectures at Yale in 1926–7, published as Evolution in Science and Religion.[18] A more controversial belief of his was eugenics. This led to his association with the Human Betterment Foundation and his praising of San Marino, California for being "the westernmost outpost of Nordic civilization . . . [with] a population which is twice as Anglo-Saxon as that existing in New York, Chicago or any of the great cities of this country." [19] ......" [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Andrews_Millikan#Later_life ]

Fred Hoyle...:
 ".....
In his well-illustrated and impressive new book, The Intelligent Universe (London: Michael Joseph, 1983, 256 pp.), Hoyle says:

…as biochemists discover more and more about the awesome complexity of life, it is apparent that its chances of originating by accident are so minute that they can be completely ruled out. Life cannot have arisen by chance (pp. 11-12).

Does this mean that Hoyle has become a creationist? Well, not exactly, and he doesn't expect to either. To forestall any speculation about his apparent "conversion," he says bluntly: "I am not a Christian, nor am I likely to become one as far as I can tell (p. 251)." Still, Hoyle argues that there must have been some "intelligence" behind the emergence of life on Earth. Setting aside the question of what sort of intelligence, he offers an interesting line of argument.
......" [  http://www.icr.org/article/243/   ]

 

 Friday, January 24, 2014 
Counter-Cosmology. 
 
 ------------REFERENCES:

 strong-arm
 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/strong-arm
 strong-arm (strông′ärm′) Informal
adj.
Using physical force or coercion: strong-arm tactics.
tr.v. strong-armed, strong-arm·ing, strong-arms
1. To use physical force or coercion against.
2. To rob by force.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.



Friday, January 24, 2014

Counter-Cosmology.

>

Above image - "Sir Fred Hoyle et Mgr G.H. Lemaître"

".....Sir James Jeans, in the 1920s, was the first to conjecture a steady state cosmology based on a hypothesized continuous creation of matter in the universe.[1][2] The idea was then revised in 1948 by Fred Hoyle, Thomas Gold, Hermann Bondi and others.......". [  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady_state_theory ]



"....
From a physicist point of view the energetic equation of ZPE will boggle their mind. Despite the massive energetic potential for clean free energy in ZPE power conversion, the ZPE energy conversion field is still not "popular" or studied in the mainstream science, physics or engineering curricular.

In particle physics it is well known that the active vacuum is incredibly energetic. Calculations by leading physicists such as Wheeler show that a cubic centimeter of vacuum (about the tip of one's little finger in volume) has so much raw energy in it that, if condensed into matter, there would be more matter than is observable in the universe through the largest telescope! So even a tiny efficiency of tapping could and will extract all the energy anyone could wish. -Tom Beardon
......" [ http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/zeropointenergy.htm  ]




 Above image - "....Georges Lemaître between Robert Millikan (on the left) and Albert Einstein (on the right). The Big Bang theory of the "Primeval Atom" triumphs. California Institute of Technology. Pasadena, 10 January 1933...."
https://www.uclouvain.be/en-316446.html
 
 ".......Please, notice the timing. This Belgian priest is thinking on the lines proposed by Albert Einstein and suggests Big Bang in 1927. This pipe smoking American publishes the velocity-distance facts observed in Mount Wilson in 1929 confirming Lemaître's basic ideas with accurate and reliable facts about star from distant galaxies.

Who is this guy?

Does anyone know that a priest was the first one to propose that there was a Big Bang?

His parents sent the boy to the classical Jesuit school, Collège du Sacré-Coeur in Charleroi in Wallonia, western Belgium. He was a brilliant student and already at the young age of 17 he was accepted to the University of Leuven to study civil engineering........" [  http://spacetheology.blogspot.it/2009/04/georges-lemaitre.html    ]

 ".......
After Arthur Eddington died in 1944, Cambridge University became a center of opposition to Lemaitre's theory of the Big Bang. In fact, it was Fred Hoyle, an astronomer at Cambridge, who sarcastically coined the term "Big Bang." Hoyle and others favored an approach to the history of the universe known as the "Steady State" in which hydrogen atoms were continuously created and gradually coalesced into gas clouds, which then formed stars.
But in 1964 there was a significant breakthrough that confirmed some of Lemaitre's theories. Workers at Bell Laboratories in New Jersey were tinkering with a radio telescope when they discovered a frustrating kind of microwave interference. It was equally strong whether they pointed their telescope at the center of the galaxy or in the opposite direction....[etc. etc. etc.]...............
Is there a paradox in this situation? Lemaitre did not think so. Duncan Aikman of the New York Times spotlighted Lemaitre's view in 1933: "'There is no conflict between religion and science,' Lemaïtre has been telling audiences over and over again in this country .... His view is interesting and important not because he is a Catholic priest, not because he is one of the leading mathematical physicists of our time, but because he is both."
......." [  http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/science/sc0022.html  ]



...OH ... look why the "Free Energy" must NOT exist... No, no, that's not for the "greediness" of the energy companies.... but the true reason is because Free Energy which relates on original Maxwell's equations (asymmetric ones, quaternions) implies the creation of energy from the "void" (= ether)... but in this manner it gives substance to the Fred Hoyle's theory of the Steady State universe... prof. Hoyle conjectured that the universe like it is – is always existed, in a stationary (maybe in some variations with also a slightly) expanding form... in the enormous emptied distances the matter could arise spontaneously... and if we know that matter and energy are linked by an equation we understand that the Free Energy theory would give validity to the Fred Hoyle's theory.... But who would be the Greater Loser?... It would be the Big Bang Theory which is born with the precise goal to oppose to the theory of the Steady State theory... Remember that the true ghost-father of this theory was as jesuit, Lemaitre.... let's put aside Einstein, evidently simply a front man of this order.... Meanwhile the Steady State theory – even if paradoxically born with the intention to deny Biblical creation - is not a sworn enemy of the Biblical Creation (because Universe could have been created by God 6000 years ago as it is now), the Big Bang theory, with billions of years of obliged evolution under which we cannot go, is an absolute enemy of the Biblical Creation... look, … in years of surfing in sites about Aliens,... when I the same was an enthusiast supporter of prof. Malanga's theory of the Alien Abductions... I actually dont remember of a single episode where I could have met someone affirming that the precise goal of the Aliens is to keep the planet earth in the obscurity respect the existence of the science of “free energy” (ether etc.)... this is for a clear reason... the Alien hoax must not reveal the true finality for which has been engineered... Free Energy, Direct Beam technology, the s.c. “anti-gravity” etc. must be kept hidden... if the establishment puts in the mouth of Aliens the purpose of keep the planet in an underdeveloped condition you obtain two negative collateral effect.... 1) you give evidence about the existence of Free Energy etc. science,.... 2) you give evidence about the falsity of the Alien and UFO phenomena, at that point a clear fabricated masque behind which to hide the interests of multinationals of energy, governments, lodges, Vatican, etc.... “.



Sunday, December 29, 2013

"...of about 14 lunations" [on the age of the universe] 

http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2013/12/of-about-14-lunations-age-of-universe.html




Thursday, January 23, 2014

".... we are LEGION". 

http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/01/we-are-legion.html


Bye bye...