Showing posts with label Big-bangology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big-bangology. Show all posts

Friday, January 24, 2014

Counter-Cosmology.

>

Above image - "Sir Fred Hoyle et Mgr G.H. Lemaître"

".....Sir James Jeans, in the 1920s, was the first to conjecture a steady state cosmology based on a hypothesized continuous creation of matter in the universe.[1][2] The idea was then revised in 1948 by Fred Hoyle, Thomas Gold, Hermann Bondi and others.......". [  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady_state_theory ]



"....
From a physicist point of view the energetic equation of ZPE will boggle their mind. Despite the massive energetic potential for clean free energy in ZPE power conversion, the ZPE energy conversion field is still not "popular" or studied in the mainstream science, physics or engineering curricular.

In particle physics it is well known that the active vacuum is incredibly energetic. Calculations by leading physicists such as Wheeler show that a cubic centimeter of vacuum (about the tip of one's little finger in volume) has so much raw energy in it that, if condensed into matter, there would be more matter than is observable in the universe through the largest telescope! So even a tiny efficiency of tapping could and will extract all the energy anyone could wish. -Tom Beardon
......" [ http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/zeropointenergy.htm  ]




 Above image - "....Georges Lemaître between Robert Millikan (on the left) and Albert Einstein (on the right). The Big Bang theory of the "Primeval Atom" triumphs. California Institute of Technology. Pasadena, 10 January 1933...."
https://www.uclouvain.be/en-316446.html
 
 ".......Please, notice the timing. This Belgian priest is thinking on the lines proposed by Albert Einstein and suggests Big Bang in 1927. This pipe smoking American publishes the velocity-distance facts observed in Mount Wilson in 1929 confirming Lemaître's basic ideas with accurate and reliable facts about star from distant galaxies.

Who is this guy?

Does anyone know that a priest was the first one to propose that there was a Big Bang?

His parents sent the boy to the classical Jesuit school, Collège du Sacré-Coeur in Charleroi in Wallonia, western Belgium. He was a brilliant student and already at the young age of 17 he was accepted to the University of Leuven to study civil engineering........" [  http://spacetheology.blogspot.it/2009/04/georges-lemaitre.html    ]

 ".......
After Arthur Eddington died in 1944, Cambridge University became a center of opposition to Lemaitre's theory of the Big Bang. In fact, it was Fred Hoyle, an astronomer at Cambridge, who sarcastically coined the term "Big Bang." Hoyle and others favored an approach to the history of the universe known as the "Steady State" in which hydrogen atoms were continuously created and gradually coalesced into gas clouds, which then formed stars.
But in 1964 there was a significant breakthrough that confirmed some of Lemaitre's theories. Workers at Bell Laboratories in New Jersey were tinkering with a radio telescope when they discovered a frustrating kind of microwave interference. It was equally strong whether they pointed their telescope at the center of the galaxy or in the opposite direction....[etc. etc. etc.]...............
Is there a paradox in this situation? Lemaitre did not think so. Duncan Aikman of the New York Times spotlighted Lemaitre's view in 1933: "'There is no conflict between religion and science,' Lemaïtre has been telling audiences over and over again in this country .... His view is interesting and important not because he is a Catholic priest, not because he is one of the leading mathematical physicists of our time, but because he is both."
......." [  http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/science/sc0022.html  ]



“...OH ... look why the "Free Energy" must NOT exist... No, no, that's not for the "greediness" of the energy companies.... but the true reason is because Free Energy which relates on original Maxwell's equations (asymmetric ones, quaternions) implies the creation of energy from the "void" (= ether)... but in this manner it gives substance to the Fred Hoyle's theory of the Steady State universe... prof. Hoyle conjectured that the universe like it is – is always existed, in a stationary (maybe in some variations with also a slightly) expanding form... in the enormous emptied distances the matter could arise spontaneously... and if we know that matter and energy are linked by an equation we understand that the Free Energy theory would give validity to the Fred Hoyle's theory.... But who would be the Greater Loser?... It would be the Big Bang Theory which is born with the precise goal to oppose to the theory of the Steady State theory... Remember that the true ghost-father of this theory was as jesuit, Lemaitre.... let's put aside Einstein, evidently simply a front man of this order.... Meanwhile the Steady State theory – even if paradoxically born with the intention to deny Biblical creation - is not a sworn enemy of the Biblical Creation (because Universe could have been created by God 6000 years ago as it is now), the Big Bang theory, with billions of years of obliged evolution under which we cannot go, is an absolute enemy of the Biblical Creation... look, … in years of surfing in sites about Aliens,... when I the same was an enthusiast supporter of prof. Malanga's theory of the Alien Abductions... I actually dont remember of a single episode where I could have met someone affirming that the precise goal of the Aliens is to keep the planet earth in the obscurity respect the existence of the science of “free energy” (ether etc.)... this is for a clear reason... the Alien hoax must not reveal the true finality for which has been engineered... Free Energy, Direct Beam technology, the s.c. “anti-gravity” etc. must be kept hidden... if the establishment puts in the mouth of Aliens the purpose of keep the planet in an underdeveloped condition you obtain two negative collateral effect.... 1) you give evidence about the existence of Free Energy etc. science,.... 2) you give evidence about the falsity of the Alien and UFO phenomena, at that point a clear fabricated masque behind which to hide the interests of multinationals of energy, governments, lodges, Vatican, etc.... “.



Sunday, December 29, 2013

"...of about 14 lunations" [on the age of the universe] 

http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2013/12/of-about-14-lunations-age-of-universe.html




Thursday, January 23, 2014

".... we are LEGION". 

http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/01/we-are-legion.html


Bye bye...

Sunday, December 29, 2013

Time Machine - II

>
 


It may have fallen to the attentive reading of some visitors of this blog the fact that the date of discovery of the Piltdown man (hoax) was between 1909 and 1910:


"Relating the incident later in December 1912, *Dawson said that that walk on the road took place "several years ago." This would put it in 1909 or 1910." [source: the Evolution Handbook as above. The text freely available also from the site http://evolutionfacts.com/index.htm ].
All converge to a more fine allegory referred to the synodic month which can be fully represented in the 29 years going from 1881 to 1910:

 "...
The average duration of the anomalistic month is:

AM = 27.55454988 days[3]
The synodic month has an average duration of:

SM = 29.530588853 days[4]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_moon_cycle ]

 A pair of final observations. The 400 millions year claimed by  Big-bangology science to be about the age of universe when appeared the first stars has a reflex in the s.c. "beat period" of Moon; and again from the above page of Wikipedia:

".....The full moon cycle is the beat period of these two, and has a duration of:
 FC = \frac{SM \times AM}{SM-AM} = 411.78443 d
[if above image not visible the beat period FC is 411.78443 days]


 Of course Satan hides himself in the details and the detail of that "about" in "...is a cycle of about 14 lunations ..." gives another almost perfect numeric copy-carbon of itself in the exact (in the imagination of Big-bangology) age of the fantasticated universe (about 13.82 billion years old), which is assumed to be little less than 14 billions year (synodic months):

"....
There are 13.944335 synodic months in a full moon cycle, the 251-month cycle approximates the full moon cycle to 13.944444 synodic months and the 767-month cycle approximates the full moon cycle to 13.9454545 synodic months.

[always from the above quoted page]

    Transforming months of synodic months in billion of years, the difference is about (with the "most accurate" measured age of universe) about 120 millions of years. This is Evolutionist science, the Science of Cush aka the Numberer...

 

 Sunday, December 29, 2013

"...of about 14 lunations" [on the age of the universe] 

http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2013/12/of-about-14-lunations-age-of-universe.html

"...of about 14 lunations" [on the age of the universe]

>

".......Meni, or Manai, signifies "The Numberer." And it is by the changes of the moon that the months are numbered: Psalm civ. 19, "He appointed the moon for seasons: the sun knoweth the time of its going down." The name of the "Man of the Moon," or the god who presided over that luminary among the Saxons, was Mane, as given in the "Edda," and Mani, in the "Voluspa."....."

[from The Two Babylons by Free Church of Scotland minister Alexander Hislop ]


"....The full moon cycle is a cycle of about 14 lunations ..."
[from Wikisource: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_moon_cycle  ]

http://www.physicsoftheuniverse.com/cosmological.html

 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/Full_moon.jpeg



"...The best measurement of the age of the universe is 13.798±0.037 billion years

"...NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) project's nine-year data release in 2012 estimated the age of the universe to be 13.772±0.059×109 years 

"... In 2013, the European Space Agency's Planck spacecraft team estimated the age of the universe to be 13.82 billion years,

"...The first reasonably accurate measurement of the rate of expansion of the universe, a numerical value now known as the Hubble constant, was made in 1958 by astronomer Allan Sandage 

"...Sandage and other astronomers repeated these measurements...(...)..and thus increase the resulting age for the universe....(....)....using these new models for stellar evolution, the estimated age of the oldest known star is 14.46±0.8 billion years.

[  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe  ] 





It may interest also...: