Showing posts with label Utøya Massacre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Utøya Massacre. Show all posts

Friday, September 25, 2015

Also Smolensk and Utøya in the 2006 Putin Summer Surprise?

        

  1. Христо СтилияновSeptember 24, 2015 at 8:13 AM

    The zaporozhets plate reads "LECH" - ЛЕХ

    Lech Kzsynski or Lech Walesa? You decide


*   *   *


Many thanks to Stiliyanov for having pointed out that little detail.

Are you ready?

First: the number 37, as already noted but pls, I don't have the time now to recall in which post, mine or Stiliyanov's, is a code-number to identify.....


37 = 20 + 17
year 2017.



 And of course at this point I consider an elementary knowledge  the fact that 3 and 7 are the factors of 21 or triple "7": 777. Like the aircraft involved in the crashes of MH37 and MH17:



 
"...17 December - 17 july = 7 months
The pope was 77 years, 7 months old when the accident with Malaysia Airlines 17 happened"
четвъртък, 21 август 2014 г.
The beast's second number? (777)
http://jesus-partisans-balkans.blogspot.it/2014/08/the-beasts-second-number-777.html

Even boring to add  that ....."The 32nd G8 summit was held on 15–17 July 2006" [Wikipedia]; and the previous day (remained "in the shadow")......


"after 13 July there's 14 July or (2 X 7)/7 or again 777" 


Let's go back to our twins, Bush & Putin, and the summit.
Four year after that Russian G8 summit you had the assassination of LECH (ЛЕХ) Kaczinski plus other 95 poeple on board the TU154 M:


"....On 10 April 2010, a Tupolev Tu-154 aircraft of the Polish Air Force crashed near the city of Smolensk, Russia, killing all 96 people on board. Among the victims were the President of Poland Lech Kaczyński and his wife Maria, the former..." etc etc etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Polish_Air_Force_Tu-154_crash

And of course after other four years (hence 4 + 4 = 8 of G8), after the Smolensk 2010 "crash", you have the MH37 crash:


Sunday, March 9, 2014
Austrian and Italian
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/03/austrian-and-italian.html



  Therefore the Putin's very first car alleged license plate, 03-07 ЛЕХ (LECH) [translated in Latin characters] is an allusion to the Smolensk 2010 "crash" and to the MH37 "crash". Again: CASE CLOSED.

But not yet closed as pertain another European fact.
Again the number "154" of Lech' TU 154-M. Activate pls the calculator of your PC, and divide 154 by 7: you obtain 22.
The number seven is repeated twenty two times in 154, which is simply a...... day of the calendar, a day like many many others:


154 / 7 = 22


7/22

 July 22nd




Friday, April 18, 2014
Within N.A.T.O. [Smolensk and Utøya are linked?] 
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/04/within-nato.html

*Edited: I inserted Stiliyanov's comment:


     Христо СтилияновSeptember 25, 2015 at 6:51 AM
    154/2 is also 77 Breiviks victims. And Breivik got 21 years in prison

  
 
But it not yet finished. Take again the number of the fateful airplane - TU 154-m, who was used to assassinate the entire Polish ruling class on 10 April 2010, in the air crash then righteously renamed: Katyn 2.

Subtract from it 17 (still an old acquaintance) and which number do you obtain???


154 - 17 = 137


Above image - you find "137" as allegory of the Ustica Massacre. Original caption of the image in the post: "...and now: Putin's Summer surprise."  " Above image - taken from the video "Is Stéphane Abrial the French pilot who shot down Aerolinee Itavia Flight 870 on 27 June 1980?" - URL: http://youtu.be/PRaS3eL7RX4"

ReplyDelete
avlesJuly 27, 2014 at 6:25 AM

The 137 millions $ are alluding to 13 July day of 1814 decree of CARABINEERS army foundation by Jesuits' Savoy king who, after being restored, immediately started persecutions against JEWS & Reformed VAUDOISES.....

It doesn't mean that every allegorical day is a day of open material war and destruction, it could be a day where very important turnings of the tide happens without other to realize it....

30 July - by Christo Stiliyanov:

събота, 26 юли 2014 г.
Hail Mary/Satan (2017) - A foretaste of the takeover (flight MH370 or 30.7?)

http://jesus-partisans-balkans.blogspot.it/2014/07/hail-marysatan-2017-tongue-of-satan.html
ReplyDelete
Sunday, July 27, 2014
...and now: Putin's Summer surprise.
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/07/and-now-putins-summer-surprise.html



Thursday, September 24, 2015
MH37 in Saint Petersburg (year 2006) G8 Summit: CASE CLOSED.
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2015/09/mh37-in-saint-petersburg-year-2006-g8.html

Friday, April 18, 2014

Within N.A.T.O. [Smolensk and Utøya are linked?]

>
 
#1 NATO flag

#2 Anders Behring Breivik

Some of mine ruminations:
  
"...SMOLENSK & UTOYA -----> Ah the Il Piccolo [newspaper of the city of Trieste] should have noticed also that there are not only films about partisans [about Partisans' guerrilla film of 1972 filmed in Tito's Yugoslavia and restored today thanks to China] ..... Two years ago the old Pahor government (center-left) Slovenia – member of UE and NATO – signed military agreements with China (also economic ones).....

Practically in the case of Slovenia NATO is collaborating with Communist China which, in her turn, is enjoying her model layout, not of model railroads but of living humans, a 'model' layout named "North Korea"..... the next head of NATO is probably the most strict friend of Putin in Europe, the Norwegian Stoltenberg.... at Utøya – Norway - participants of a camp for the anti-Israeli indoctrination were murdered.... they have been termed also "pro-Russian"....

Following the rule of the "false flag" logic, thanks to that massacre, today, the ones to be on the moral accusation's bar are every pro-Israel and pro-USA subject.... Practically this silent tactic is aiming to transform NATO in a sort of "New Warsaw Pact" and to use it as cage to imprison USA (exactly like UE is the cage where to imprison Germany inside the Counter Reformation Oder-Neisse line and to squeeze Poland & neighbor).....

For this reason Lech Kaczynzky and other 95 people have been assassinated.... Kaczynzky was searching help from America in order to escape the crushing by the European Union and her New Imperialist Russia ally and in fact the refined minds gave green light to Anders Breivik after Smolensk, when Lech Kaczynsky could no more defend his cause....

This is the reason why the Utøya Massacre and the Smolensk 2010 air crash are linked and are visibly part of the same strategy finalized in to eliminate both morally (Utøya ) as well physically (Smolensk) any possible ally of USA within the NATO.... Does all that come from Moscow? I seriously doubt about it even if there's more than a clear evidence that the Kremlin enjoys very much it and often materially participates (Smolensk) in the implementation of this slow process of isolation of USA within NATO.... But once the American continent will be completely led under the feet of the Rome's pope, Orthodox Russia (and China) will do the unpleasant discovery to be encircled, this time not by "US imperialism" but by the Zouaves of the pope...."

*   *   *
    The news is of the same day of the anniversary of the Smolensk 2010 air crash:

Norway Interested to Invest in Slovenia

Business,  10 Apr 2014  / By STA, T. M.
PM Alenka Bratušek met her Norwegian counterpart Erna Solberg and took part in a business conference in Oslo on Wednesday as part of a visit designed to boost economic cooperation between the nations and raise Norwegian investors' interest in the ongoing privatisation in Slovenia.
......"
URL: http://www.sloveniatimes.com/norway-interested-to-invest-in-slovenia

See Slovenia and Norway two months before the attack at Utøya :  

Saturday, July 23, 2011 

Spectacular fireworks at 22.11 hours 

http://avles-theamberpath.blogspot.it/2011/07/spectacular-fireworks-at-2211-hours.html

     

     In case you forgot it, the month before the attack at Utøya,  Slovenia, NATO member, signed military collaboration with Communist China. [see References].


      Another very telling information: immediately after the attack at Utøya, suspects arose that NATO would have been the mastermind. The NATO would had a "revenge"  punishing Norway for having abandoned the war on Gaddafi's Libya:


A Webster Tarpley
tarpley.net

They had to fire more than one island. A tutorial on the bomb attacks in Oslo just ended. Maybe a revenge for the NATO Norway's decision not to bomb Libya more?

The tragic terror attacks in Norway have a number of telltale signs of a false flag provocation (false flag NDT). It is reported that - although the world media are attempting to focus on Anders Behring Breivik as a lone murderess in the tradition of Lee Harvey Oswald - many eyewitnesses agree that a second shooter was at work in the massacre at the youth summer camp on Utøya outside Oslo.
[title:  FROM LEE OSWALD TO LEE OSLO, VIA “GLADIO” ? , Italian : DA LEE OSWALD A LEE OSLO, VIA “GLADIO” ?]

       Etc. etc., readily translated in Italian and then posted at the Comedonchisciotte site where you still can find it:
 http://www.comedonchisciotte.org/site/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=8676#_ftn2

        But the original page of Wester Tarpley from where the article was translated does exist NO more... Why? But maybe because the same Norway Prime Minister 'punished' by NATO for having withdrew the troops from Libya then became the head of the same NATO?....    


above image - Webster Tarpley page: disappeared.


        In the same  page of Comedonchisciotte site where there's the translated (in Italian) and disappeared article of Webster Tarpley, there's the link to the articles quoting the Prime Minister friend of Putin and Hamas, four years ago opposing the same organization of which today he is going to be the head:


"...OSLO, May 13 (Reuters) - The solution to Libya's bloody uprising must be based on political action and not only military might, Norway's Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg said on Friday.
"The solution to the problems in Libya are political, they cannot be solved by military means alone," Stoltenberg told reporters on the sidelines of a conference in Oslo.
"We are very much supporting all efforts to find a political solution to the challenges we are facing in Libya," he added.
Norway's government this week pledged to scale down its role in NATO-orchestrated air strikes on Libya after its current three-month commitment ends on June 24. [ID:nLDE7481ET] (Reporting by Oslo newsroom; Editing by Louise Ireland)".

See the article in:  http://www.trust.org/item/?map=libya-solution-more-political-than-military-norway

     Even the original page where the article was translated in Italian and from where it was reported by Comedonchisciotte disappeared:

http://www.megachip.info/finestre/zero-11-settembre/6520-da-lee-oswald-a-lee-oslo-via-qgladioq.html25.07.2011
 

above image - Megachip page: disappeared


    Both Wester Tarpley and Megachip are cunning guys.... They were ready to wipe away the compromising reference to NATO as true mastermind of Utøya Massacre. Even if or, better, just because they attributed at the beginning in July 2011 a purposely deceiving goal for that massacre. See again the URL of the Tarpley article then translated by Microchip and reported by Comedonchisciotte, it has been written two days after the massacre:  http://tarpley.net/2011/07/24/norway-terror-attacks-a-false-flag/ 24.07.2011. Megachip published it immediately, only the day after. But what makes to think is the fact that among all the 'alternative' information given in the last decade, right this one involving NATO disappeared....:



Friday, April 4, 2014

From the Strait of Hormuz
 to the Arctic circle. 
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/04/from-strait-of-hormuz-to-arctic-circle.html

 

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Poland and Lithuania members of EUROGENDFOR [case closed] 

http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/03/poland-and-lithuania-members-of.html


-------------REFERENCES:

Monday, August 15, 2011


T minus 25 days: China creates military schools for Slovenia [= NATO]


>

Slovenia is a N.A.T.O. member.

N.A.T.O. is bombing Libya against the apparent will of China (& Russia).

But you know that it is also just thanks to that Libyan war - rigorously N.A.T.O. produced – and consequent rumors on the “race for Libyan oil” that China can continue undisturbed and not observed to occupy the rest of the African Continent south of Islamic North Africa.....

The historical visit occured 25 days before the Massacre of Oslo


.............. . . . . . .



Monday, 27.06.2011, 19:06

Gantar and Jelušič with high-level talks launched visit in China

BEIJING - President of the National Assembly Pavel Gantar and Defence Minister Ljubica Jelusic started a separate visit to China.

Gantar has met with Chinese Vice President Xi Jinpingom, Jelusic with the Deputy Head of the Central Military Commission Xu Caihouj. Both also attended a reception at the Slovenian National Day.
Excellent and friendly relations between the two countries
As reported in the National Assembly, Xi and Gantar in a conversation that lasted longer than originally anticipated, highlighted the excellent and friendly relations between the two countries, Vice President of China congratulated with Slovenia on 20th anniversary of independence. As estimated in the past few years, Slovenia has made significant development, a factor of peace and stability and plays an active role in international organizations.
President of the National Assembly DZ (Slovenian parliament – avles) about the areas where China and Slovenia could strengthen economic cooperation, mentioned in particular the chemical and pharmaceutical industry, transport and infrastructure, telecommunications and science and research. Although Slovenia is the largest economic partner of China in the Western Balkans, there are still open possibilities for closer cooperation with the harbour of Koper and high-tech and other companies.
Gantar has also met with the Chairman of the Standing Committee of Chinese People's Congress Wu Bangguojem by which they agreed that relations between the two countries in the past two decades developed into close cooperation. Political contacts are looking at the highest level, Gantar expressed his belief that there is mutual interest in strengthening, in particular economic cooperation.
Wu thanked Slovenia for support for one-China policy
Wu thanked Slovenia for supporting the one-China policy and its active role in the dialogue between China and the EU. He highlighted China's interest for Slovenia's participation in the automotive industry, development of infrastructure and in education and tourism.

The Defence Minister whose the most important meeting - a meeting with Chinese Defence Minister Liang Guangliejem - namely waiting on Tuesday, has since met today with Deputy Head of the Central Military Commission, a three-star generals Caihoujem Xu.
Strengthening defense cooperation
He explained that this commission is the highest decision making body of the military and defense matters in China. The talks were focused mainly on bilateral defense cooperation, and it was expressed much willingness to continue and strengthen this cooperation in the future. The most important "export point" of Slovenia as regard the words of the Minister, is the center of excellence for mountain warfare in Bohinjska Bela.
Jelušič lectured at universities in Beijing
Jelusic also visited the National Defence University in Beijing, where they attend school together highest military-political, defense and civil-political structures. As explained in Slovenia we do not have anything like that yet, but it is in preparation such a course for general staff in which they could also invite representatives of civil policy. The university also had a lecture in which the Slovenian Minister of Defense highlighted the main security challenges facing both Slovenia and China.
"We have now a very successful visit"
The statement by the Minister reminded that this visit is the first visit by a Slovenian defense minister to China, while adding that it was also the first visit of a female Defence Minister to China in the last five years. She further stated, "It's already very successful visit."

Both Prime Minister and Slovenian National Assembly president Gantaras in the Kempinski Hotel in Beijing attended the commemoration on the 20th years of Slovenian statehood, which was prepared by the Slovenian Embassy. Gantar in his address to more than one hundred guests at the reception - diplomats, businessmen and other distinguished guests - underlined that Slovenia and China have shown that the differences between territorial distance are not hindering mutual understanding and cooperation.
STA

Photo: Ana Kovač/siol.net, Reuters


.............. . . . . . .




Sunday, 24 July 2011

The arms embargo the European Union China

China People's Liberation Army, with nearly 2.3 million active soldiers largest army in the world, and these, according to the rules does not depend on weapons imported from the European Union. The European Union has teamed up with the United States by the events in Tiananmen Square in 1989, an embargo on arms sales to China of the Member States. The main reason for such a move could find in the fact that the European Union did so to show disapproval for the events, but also prevent repression of the state over its own people.

(….......)

A source close to EU High Representative outside Ashton says he is nearing the end of the embargo. Embargoes are already since many years loudly criticized, among others, have been criticized by Gerhard Schröder and Jacques Chirac. Both were of the opinion that it is completely absurd. Former French president see mainly the nonsense that equates the China embargo to other countries, to which also applies the European Union embargo on arms sales. Myanmar, Zimbabwe and Sudan, in his words, can not be compared with China. Former German Chancellor Schröder has also seen the embargo nonsense, since China today is no longer the one in 1989. Both France and Germany with the withdrawal would obtain a large gain, as it promises arms exports to China, although both countries are trying to reject the view that they want to cessation of the embargo only in order to trade weapons.


Despite the eventual elimination of the embargo it would remain subject to certain restrictions. In 1998, the European Union adopted a Code of Conduct on Conventional Arms Exports. The Code consists sufficiently thorough and comprehensive and could still theoretically stop the sale of weapons in different situations. Among the many articles in connection with China is particularly important article, which prohibits the sale, if there is a "clear risk for internal repression." This article would prohibit the sale in case of suspicion of weapons for purposes that would constitute a violation of human rights. Another, in the case of China, an important article is one that prohibits the sale, if there would be a "clear risk that weapons will be used aggressively against another country or to occupy other countries." This article would prohibit arms sales, if it could remain the suspect that China wanted to take Taiwan. This is strictly against the embargo, but by the rules contained in the code, the risk would be greater. However, this requires a certain degree of skepticism, because the European Union does not officially recognize Taiwan. However, the problem of the Code lies in the fact that it is - as told by Lithuanian MEP Justas Paleckis - in practice ignored.

Because of possible complications related to Taiwan are against the embargo and the United States. Recently it came to media related documents, which it sent the Wikileaks. This document was written with the intention of the U.S. to mobilize its embassy in the European Union and to prevent Spain's intention to abolish the embargo. Member of the Iberian Peninsula has taken the presidency of the European Union in the first half of last year clearly called for the abolition of it, but despite its favorable prospects experts have failed to do.

The United States already firmly defends the embargo, since, according to former President Bush, in a case the tightening relationship between China and Taiwan, U.S. are also those who were "forced" to protect Taiwan. The European Union as an ally of the United States in this area would not like to afford complications. This is particularly relevant because in 2005 China adopted a so-called "anti-secessionist" law that gives the military the power to prevent by force the independence of Taiwan ..
(read: use tensions USA-China as alibi to put troubles between USA and Europe... - avles)

(…............)

The question is what would actually constitute a lifting of the embargo? I guess this would be more than not only an indicator of closer relations between China and the European Union as well as an indicator of the EU China acknowledges some positive changes. China, nevertheless, it still violates some human rights, however, is no longer the China, as it was in 1989 on the implementation of the embargo.

(…............)



European Union, should the embargo end, would came one step closer to China. To desire mutual participation by both, especially in the economic field, we clearly see the recent visit of Chinese delegation and President Hu Jintao in Europe. China clearly wants lifting of the embargo, but not due to any greater need for European weapons, but because of the aforementioned symbolic importance. The Asian superpower has repeatedly underlined the anger, but also the sadness because of this document. The latter speaks about the embargo "reluctantly" referring to it to as slap to her politics, and often spoke to the European Union about the abolition. President Hu Jintao said that the removal of European embargo would signal the acceptance of China as an equal force on the world scene. Particularly because China believes that it is not in the same position as other countries with the same restriction, especially after the European Union in October 2009 withdrew the embargo on arms sales to Uzbekistan.

(…............)


.............. . . . . . .
WDG's intelligence way of operate?

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Anders Breivik and Lithuanian political scandals

>

#1 European Union flag

 
#2 Anders Breivik

#3 Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Smolensk 2010 air crash


"Who paid him? To do what? His targets were members of a Russia-friendly left-wing Norwegian political party. How did his terrorist actions against them serve the interests of communist Belarus?"
[by the atheist conservative - quoted in my: http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/04/anders-breiviks-connection-with.html]

 "...... Poland played an invaluable role in the coup. It has always dreamt of restoring its former power and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. ....".
[ a statement by Major General Alexander Yakimenko, February 2014; quoted in my: http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/03/aleksandr-yakimenkos-open-confession-of.html ]
 
"....Aside from those issues, his [of Lech Kaczynsky] immediate goals were to develop tangible strategic partnership with Ukraine and greater co-operation with the Baltic states, Azerbaijan and Georgia

[in my: http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/03/the-spy-who-came-ii.html]

*   *   * 
   
 Anders Breivik and Lithuanian nationalist party Order and Justice:




Breivik in his manifesto; “Order and Justice“ is a model nationalist party

URL: http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/7616/breivik-in-his-manifesto-order-and-justice-is-a-model-nationalist-party-20117616/

The Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik, whose bloody attacks shook the whole world, devoted a lot of attention to Lithuania in his manifesto, entitled “2083: A European Declaration of Independence”. “Order and Justice” (“Tvarka ir teisingumas” in Lithuanian), the political party of the impeached president Rolandas Paksas, did not evade the sight of the Norwegian butcher. He has listed this political force among the most noteworthy of Eastern European nationalist parties, as Šarūnas Černiauskas wrote in Delfi.lt portal on the 25th of July. A. B. Breivik mentions Lithuania and Lithuanians in various contexts. True, there are few positive records. The “Order and Justice” followers are perhaps the only phenomenon which the Oslo killer approves of.
Lithuanians – the sharks of the arms trade

In one of the sections of the 1,500-page manifesto, A. B. Breivik analyses criminality in the United Kingdom and draws attention to purportedly flourishing arms dealers from Lithuania.
“The recently completed investigation revealed the arms trade deal which took place in London, whereby a Lithuanian gang traded handguns in exchange for the possibility to get acquainted with Colombian cocaine liaisons. Another investigation dismantled a sex slave trafficking group composed of Lithuanian, Albanian, and Chinese criminals. (…) All criminal groups are ready to resort to violence when conducting robberies, racketeering or consolidating drugs trade agreements. Firearms, seen as a tool and a way of expressing one’s intentions, are a priority. Some groups, especially new gangs from Lithuania, are formed with the intention of meeting this demand,” – wrote A. B. Breivik.
“Order and Justice” members – exemplary nationalists?
The Oslo killer dedicated a separate section to Eastern European right-wing nationalist political organizations. The “Order and Justice” party appeared amongst them.
A. B. Breivik claimed that the nationalists in the Eastern Europe do not puzzle much about the worst, according to him, problems – immigrants and Muslims.
“The terms “anti-immigrant” or “anti-Islamic” are beyond the concern of the biggest Eastern European nationalist parties. As immigration is very limited in these countries, the parties do not mobilize against immigrants. Instead, they spread a strong right-wing nationalism and incite anti-European Union sentiments, as well as anti-Semitism (in particular, Poland‘s “Self-Defence” party and Hungary’s “Justice and Life” party) and opposition to other ethnic groups, especially Roma (Gipsies) – the terrorist shared his insights.
He does not forget the movement “Nashi” (Russian “Ours”), active in Russia, whose members the Western media purportedly wrongly labels as being fascist.
“There are several forms of “nationalism” in Russia. There are pro-Kremlin organisations like “Nashi” (a pro-government youth organisation), which oppose all fascist groups, including the national socialists.
Ironically, the Marxist/multiculturalist (politically correct) Western European media sees “Nashi” and all the supporters of the Russian government (including the government itself) as “fascist”.
After these brief insights, A. B. Breivik provided a list of Eastern European nationalist parties (for some countries, he singled out only the ones that do not advocate Islamic beliefs).
In this list, Lithuania, which has a medley of nationalist organizations has only one political power of this sort – the “Order and Justice” party.
According to the Oslo butcher’s data, R. Paksas’ party reached the fourth best political outcome in the Eastern Europe, receiving 11.4 per cent of the votes during the 2004 elections to the Seimas (the Lithuanian Parliament). “Order and Justice” in A. B. Breivik’s list fell below only the Kremlin-loyal party “United Russia” (63.3 per cent of votes in the 2007 elections), the Montenegrin/Serbian People‘s Party (14.6 per cent of votes in the 2006 elections), and the Slovak National Party (11.7 per cent of votes in the 2006 elections).
According to A. B. Breivik’s list, Estonia has two nationalist parties. Latvia’s list is even longer: the Oslo killer has found six nationalist parties and organisations.
At the end of the manifesto, A. B. Breivik reminds his readers that they are not alone. In Europe, there are allegedly millions of people sympathizing with their beliefs and concerned about “Marxist/ multiculturalist/ Muslim” crimes. Lithuania is one of the many countries, where A. B. Breivik’s supporters may find “faithful brothers and sisters”. The Vatican also appears in the list.
V. Mazuronis: difficult to comment what a maniac takes into his head

Valentinas Mazuronis, a representative of the “Order and Justice” group in the Seimas, told DELFI that he could not understand how the name of his party could have appeared in the Oslo killer‘s manifesto.

“Our party does not have and has never had any relations (with the nationalists – DELFI), not to mention with the Norwegian guys. Why and what does this guy write about? I would carry strong doubts about his mental state. (…) I find it difficult to comment on what a maniac has in his head”, – said the “Order and Justice” member.
Urges to hunt skinheads
V. Mazuronis condemned any sort of nationalism and encouraged the Lithuanian law enforcement authorities to monitor such movements in Lithuania more effectively.
“I approached the Prosecutor’s Office when the fascist flags were raised on the bridges because I believed that this was serious. Unfortunately, there was no serious reaction. (…) Our Special Investigation Service should seriously address the situation in Lithuania. I mean all the manifestations of Murza’s (a radical nationalist and anti-Semitic Lithuanian politician) movement and all these skinhead organisations. And this should be done very seriously and strictly. Norway is a warning,” – summed up the interviewee.
Edited by Nicola Lavey

     Well, what happened to the head of the Order and Justice party to which Anders Breivik deserved a special attention (in the manual by him allegedly written)?

 

Lithuanian Parliament Removes Country's President After Casting Votes on Three Charges

By STEVEN LEE MYERS
Published: April 7, 2004 
URL:  http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/07/world/lithuanian-parliament-removes-country-s-president-after-casting-votes-three.html

 The Lithuanian Parliament removed President Rolandas Paksas from office on Tuesday, ending a political scandal that has roiled the country for nearly six months even as it celebrated its new membership in NATO and the European Union.

The Parliament, or Seimas, ousted Mr. Paksas less than 14 months after he took office, voting on three counts that he violated his oath and the Lithuanian Constitution through his dealings with a Lithuanian-Russian businessman suspected of links to Russian organized crime.
Mr. Paksas, 47, became the first European leader to be removed from office by the impeachment process. The Parliament's speaker, Arturas Paulauskas, a political rival, took over as acting president after the voting, pending a new election that by law must be held within two and a half months.
All along Mr. Paksas, a flamboyant stunt pilot and populist politician, denied the charges, accusing his opponents of exacting political revenge for his unexpected victory in a presidential runoff in January 2003.
Appearing before Parliament as it prepared to vote, he sounded contrite, acknowledging mistakes but saying that none merited his impeachment. ''I do not feel guilty,'' he said.
His remarks did little to persuade Parliament to grant him leniency. And his behavior of late, often seen as erratic and temperamental, only worsened his prospects for political survival.
As the vote neared, he appointed the businessman at the center of the scandal, Yuri Borisov, as a special adviser and then reversed himself within hours, saying he had been pressured by Mr. Borisov.
The ouster comes less than a month before Lithuania is to cement its place in Europe by joining the European Union, a tremendous accomplishment for a country that regained its independence from the Soviet Union less than 13 years ago. A week ago it officially became a member of NATO, welcoming the arrival of four Belgian F-16's to patrol the skies over the Baltics.
Many in Lithuania have viewed the scandal as a sign of the strength of the country's nascent democracy, albeit an embarrassing one.
Despite the political turmoil -- heightened by an undercurrent of fear about Russia's meddling in the country's affairs -- the impeachment process did little to distract the country from its principal economic and foreign policy goal of joining Europe's elite club of nations. Lithuania, eager to demonstrate its commitment to NATO and the United States, has also deployed troops to Afghanistan and Iraq.
''The democracy of Lithuania is proven,'' Vytautas Landsbergis, the first president of post-Soviet Lithuania and one of the parliamentary deputies who voted against Mr. Paksas, said in a telephone interview. ''We are able to cope even with such a problematic situation. And we did it in an absolutely peaceful and constitutional way.''
Mr. Paksas, the third post-Soviet president, was accused of improperly restoring citizenship to Mr. Borisov, the owner of a helicopter manufacturer, Aviabaltika, which has been accused of illegal arms sales to Sudan. Mr. Borisov contributed $400,000 to Mr. Paksas' presidential campaign, and in exchange, according to parliamentary investigators, received preferential access to the president's office.
Calls for his impeachment intensified after the country's State Security Department reported last fall that he had also leaked classified information to Mr. Borisov about investigations into his dealings. Mr. Paksas also faced a third charge of interfering in a privatization deal.
Photo: Rolandas Paksas was removed as president of Lithuania yesterday while some of his supporters held his picture outside the Parliament. (Photo by Associated Press)
....".

      Please, notice the date, of course the one of the article refers to the date on the voting of the resolution. Just-in-time with  the Massacre of Utøya. 




 URL: http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/7028/the-two-sides-of-rolandas-paksas%E2%80%99s-story-by-medelinskas-20117028/

About six months ago, the Strasbourg Court made a resolution regarding the case of the former President Paksas but only recently has the Lithuanian Government submitted a proposition to actually deal with the legal issue. And as always, as soon as something concerning Paksas is mentioned, a ruthless battle between his supporters and haters begins. Interestingly enough, both groups only see one side of Paksas whereas there are at least two, Alvydas Medelinskas wrote in Delfi.lt portal on 2 June.
I admit, for quite some time Paksas’s case has been like a litmus paper to me, indicating the prevailing injustice in Lithuania with all forces thrown against one person who is aiming to deal with corruption. But a few years after the impeachment, the Order and Justice Party gained power and showed that good words don’t necessary mean good works, and the Party’s Chairman Paksas was defending and protecting the culprit personally. It was then when Paksas showed his other side.
Following the judgment of the Strasbourg Court, I find many former merciless critics of Paksas who now begin seeing white where they used to see only black. And Paksas’s activities weren’t just black and white. Earlier, when I was defending Paksas during the impeachment, I, too, saw only one colour, saw a bright face of a promising fighter against corruption and perceived the ban for life from participating in the Lithuanian political world as a crime not only against democracy but against justice as well. This face is much darker now but the prolonged ban from becoming a member of the Seimas looks too harsh nonetheless. The Strasbourg Court shares the same opinion.
By the way, this judgement says nothing on the circumstances of the impeachment and the possibility for Paksas to become a president again. Previously, Paksas has said that after this judgement he would return to his office in Daukantas St, and now he’s explaining obscurely that if he got elected into the Seimas and then as the Chairman of the Seimas then chances are he could become president again. It’s unclear if Paksas had the path of Artūras Paulauskas in mind, who only became president after an impeachment because he failed during the elections.
During the 7 years after Paksas’s impeachment I’ve had to explain time and again why I doubted the usefulness of this procedure to Lithuania. And when the dirty works of the Order and Justice Party in the municipality of Vilnius (I covered this issue elaborately) finally came to light, members of this party were asking me why I was so critical towards them.
On the other hand, with Paksas out of the way not many cared about carrying on with the implementation of justice. The high bar of legal, moral, and constitutional norms didn’t apply to President Valdas Adamkus and other politicians. Members of the Order and Justice Party themselves, when gained power in Vilnius, showed that they only wanted to fight the corruption of other parties. Maybe when Paksas became president it wasn’t corruption and justice that clashed, but the interests of several groups, although those who only wanted justice were involved too. I’m pretty sure that we still don’t see the entire picture. And this matter should be settled not in Strasbourg but here, in Lithuania.
The story with the citizenship of Yuri Borisov which was granted to him by Paksas is very similar to that of Mansur Sadekov, who was granted citizenship by Valdas Adamkus (probably for financial support during elections). And later, Adamkus rewarded Vladimir Jakunin, a KGB general, and appointed people on the KGB reserve list to top positions at foreign affairs and security related institutions. Why? Can’t we ask Adamkus?
I wish that Lithuania became a country where the actions of former leaders aren’t discussed but the activities of current leaders are analysed instead. Another question: should it be done in court or via impeachment? If in our country an attempt to reveal all the dirty works of the politicians was made, I’m sure many people, even those who met Paksas’s impeachment with resent, would believe that justice applies to the powerful white-collars.
But nothing happened and Adamkus finished his tenure without any problems. He didn’t notice the privatization activities in Vilnius when it was run by his protectee Artūras Zuokas and the privatization of the entire country when it became Brazauskas’s zone of interest. And they are called good presidents. Monuments are built from taxpayers’ money and annuities are assigned. And what should a common man think of justice when seeing all this?
Despite all the work of the commission during the impeachment of Paksas, many questions remain unanswered. Why did he want to appoint Borisov his advisor, what are the connections between the two men? How could someone who waged war against corruption get involved in the “Žemaitijos Keliai” story which is similar to the one with Brazauskas and the hotel “Draugystė”. One was concerned with the well-being of a beloved woman, and the other – with his friend’s interests. Why Paksas was protecting Remigijus Ačas, who was accused of smuggling, and even wanted him to work at the President’s Office?
Paksas would give different answers each time and when all of the cases were cancelled by the General Prosecutor’s Office, he suggested forgetting the matter altogether. Back then I didn’t know that many influential people in Lithuania could cancel an investigation or prevent it from initiating. For example, the “Rubikonas” case.
And then a corruption scandal shook the Vilnius municipality. The case was sluggish even though the information coming from the court indicated who the guilty were. The Order and Justice Party’s coming to power wasn’t accompanied by a desire to bring justice. Today, no one will know why the Seimas prevented the main person responsible, Evaldas Lementauskas, who became a member of the Seimas, from being tried. But I’m absolutely certain that the suggestion for Ačas to resign from the mayor of Raseiniai and allow Lementauskas to take his place in the Seimas was planned with Paksas knowing and giving approval, and the rest was just a smokescreen for the voters.
The law enforcement agency was interested in the dirty deeds of the Vilnius vice-mayor, the treasurer of the party and the right hand of its leader. The case could have disclosed how corrupt the party was, thus it was bound to be terminated. Even though Paksas was just an ordinary member of the municipality, Mayor Juozas Imbrasas was accountable to him. And Lementauskas was taking care of the main issues: the (non)construction of the national stadium (the same company built apartments near Kristina Brazauskienė’s hotel), the construction permit for Maxima near the Vingis Park.
And most importantly, as it was revealed in court, the majority of decisions were bought. The Special Investigation Service (STT) got hold of Lementauskas and allowed him to operate freely for some time. Despite the accusations, Paksas offered him the position of executive secretary of the party.
For the meantime, when the law enforcement agency starts investigating a politician, it is not interested in the possible connections with the party’s leaders or if those leaders are corrupt too but they are actually the ones who make decisions at municipalities, the Seimas and the Government.
As the municipality elections were closing in, I had a discussion with Zuokas, who wanted to become a mayor again, and explained why the man who sold out Vilnius should not return. Then Zuokas showed me a document which allegedly proved that the selling out of Vilnius cinema was arranged by Paksas, who paved the way for Zuokas’s return.
I admit, when I worked at the President’s Office I heard people ask if the director of a flying club Paksas could afford a house from his salary, could his small construction company get a construction contract from a Russian energy giant? Back then, I brushed doubts away and tried to convince myself that if a person decided to fight against the so-called clan, he should expect a strong smear campaign. Now I understand the young supporters of Zuokas who dismiss the accusations of selling out, VEKS (Vilnius – European Capital of Culture) and other shady projects. The supporters of Paksas do the same thing when hearing claims that he could be a part of political corruption.
Seven years after the impeachment have proved that this process had both the desire of some people for more justice and the selfish interests of certain politicians and judges. The other side of the process was wrong too, I began thinking so after the impeachment. This contradiction didn’t allow me to live peacefully.
I admit, I only started evaluating Paksas performance at the Presidential Office objectively after getting to know his party’s doings in Vilnius and that back then he had all the leverage. And then I realized something that had been a heresy before: Paksas was punished for HIS OWN deals with Borisov, “Žemaitijos Keliai”, etc., and the people of Lithuania, because of Paksas, lost a chance to create a legal and democratic country seven years ago.
Its creation could have been facilitated by the top Governmental officials but they should have worked honourably and fairly, serving as an example to follow. Another question is wasn’t Paksas punished too harshly? Were the initiators so clean and sinless? Did they create assumptions artificially to reach their goal?
As new circumstances were appearing, I felt free from having biased opinions about certain politicians and parties. By the way, I’ve never been a member of the Order and Justice nor the Liberal Democrats. Having realized all this, I felt the need to live and do something important for my country. Just like during the Sąjūdis (Lithuanian Reform Movement). The goal is to make people demand justice in Lithuania.
Today, I wouldn’t claim that Paksas and his party have nothing to do with corruption and maybe even with smuggled money. And I wouldn’t defend him like I did during the impeachment. But I’ve always been against a permanent ban for such politicians and the Strasbourg Court agrees with me.
We live in a country where numerous party leaders are corrupt, but such evil deeds must be dealt with by fair elections, not bans, which only add up to the creation of the myth about political martyrdom and prevent the people from realizing who is who.

   We deliver languages. Worldwide.


       Well, what was that Strasbourg court sentence? Give a look, there you appreciate that Roland Paksas was also Euro-skeptic but at the same time not a crazy anti-European head, it seems he was sober, just like a certain Lech Kazynsky:


 

Lithuania loses Euro court case over ex-leader Paksas

URL:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12126217

 
 Mr Paksas is now an MEP in a group opposed to deeper EU integration


The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that Lithuania was wrong to bar former President Rolandas Paksas from running for parliament after he had been ousted from power in 2004.
Lithuania violated an article on free elections in the European Convention on Human Rights, the ruling said.
Mr Paksas was impeached and removed from office as president after the Baltic state's constitutional court found that he had abused his position.
He is now a Euro MP in Strasbourg.
The judgement by the Strasbourg court on Thursday is binding, meaning that Lithuania, an EU member state, will have to act on it to prevent any similar violation in future.
But the judges did not award Mr Paksas compensation, saying their ruling was in itself "sufficient just satisfaction".
Lithuania was found to have violated Article Three of Protocol One (Right to free elections) in the European Convention on Human Rights.
Landmark impeachment In 2004 Mr Paksas became the first European head of state in modern times to be impeached and removed from office.
The former Soviet republic's constitutional court found that he had illegally arranged Lithuanian citizenship for a Russian-born businessman, Yuri Borisov.
But Mr Paksas, an aerobatic pilot in Soviet times, was cleared of the charge of having leaked state secrets to Russia.
After the constitutional court had backed Mr Paksas's disqualification, the Lithuanian parliament adopted a new electoral rule barring anyone from becoming an MP if they had previously been dismissed in impeachment proceedings.
Mr Paksas complained that the rule had been passed deliberately to bar him from office. He also said the constitutional court had lacked impartiality and had exceeded its powers.
The Strasbourg judges accepted that a breach of the constitution was "a particularly serious matter", but they argued that Mr Paksas's permanent and irreversible disqualification from running for election was disproportionate.
In 2009 Mr Paksas was elected to the European Parliament. He sits with the Europe of Freedom and Democracy group, which seeks to defend national sovereignty and prevent the further concentration of power in Brussels. 
....".


*   *   *

      Roland Paksas was hit by the scandal in 2004.  In the same year when Anders Breivik went in Lithuania to open a bank account. Roland Paksas' Order and Justice party had a special treatment inside the (alleged) Breivik's manual. Could this allude to Roland Paksas as gear wheel of the bloody mechanism which led to the Massacre in July 2011?... Or, instead,  the former Lithuanian  president who resigned in the same year for a scandal, was only a man framed using Anders Breivik's ideology

      Anders Breivik, was used to build many connections with people who couldn't foresee what would happen seven years later (Utøya Massacre)?...  But whose public figure, if linked in a manner or other with or  positively quoted inside the Breivik's manual,  would have been polluted with the following blood of those 77 anti-Zionist (and pro-Putin's Russia) fighters? And with opportune physical travels in some countries with some financial deals exactly in time proximity with scandals involving political figures of those countries?  In order to allude in the future to an eventual connection of those scandals with the Breivik's short visits? Was therefore only the case  to press Anders Breivik to have short but significant deals with some countries of the old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, or a deliberate choice of someone who was inspiring and accompanying his spiritual (initiation) growth?

 

"....Swept into office as voters repudiated the group of former Communist officials who had dominated the country’s politics for much of the preceding decade, Mr. Kaczynski and his brother struggled at the top. They frequently put Poland on a collision course with its European Union partners and Russia, while polarizing voters at home with a shift to the right.
(.....)
Poland joined the European Union in 2004, but Mr. Kaczynski often preferred dealing with the United States.
A devout Roman Catholic, Mr. Kaczynski was regarded as skeptical of the European Union while he fought to defend Poland’s sovereignty against Brussels and to protect its traditional, conservative values. In 2008, he argued against ratifying the union’s Lisbon Treaty for fear its prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation would become Polish law. ..."

From the New York Times

URL:  http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/11/world/europe/11kaczynski.html?_r=0

     Notice the year when Poland joined EU: 2004.
     Paksas remained politically buried from 2004 till the Utøya Massacre and Lech Kaczyński was murdered the year before. No one ever linked the human and political lives of both men before?.... I would imagine why....
     Yes it was just this to kill him, that to be a 'devoted' Roman Catholic but at the same time a fierce opponents to the popish dreams of a renewed union between Western Roman Empire (EU) and Eastern Roman Empire (Putin's Russia). At the end of all another victim of SJ Wladimir Ledochowsky's war against politically independent minded Catholics who clashed against the Jesuits' evil dream of absolute temporal power in the Old Continent :

 Saturday, April 12, 2014

"Anders Breivik’s connection with LITHUANIA has been revealed." 

 http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/04/anders-breiviks-connection-with.html




Monday, April 14, 2014 

YOU ARE NEXT. 

http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/04/you-are-next.html