Syrian civil war: Reincarnation taking revenge on Resurrection?

>
Except Satan opposing our Lord, it is hard to find in the world an higher antagonism like the one between the opposite conceptions of Reincarnation vs Ressurrection. 

The first divides the Soul from the Body in an absolute manner. It is of Manichean origin because if the soul and body were created by different Gods, every one having power on the proper realm and not on the other.

Reincarnation is indulgence towards the proper sins. You have not to repent of them. Next life will be better. So don't make waves with all these problems of the sinners and of the repentance. If you have a million of reincarnations at disposition,  you can be an Adolf Hitler, then who cares? In the 1,000,001st reincarnation you will be saved. The problem is the same of the ones who want to cease to smoke: tomorrow I stop smoking; next life I will think to the "errors" (instead to say "sins") of this life.

Resurrection says that  you die ONCE. And that you are responsible not simply for what you commit with your body which has been created by the same God who created your soul, and gave this body to your soul in order to be administered witnessing the glory of God. You are responsible for having let the material world to have polluted your soul with evilness: it is called "sin". But God knows that it is impossible to avoid that and sent on earth His Son to deliver all men and women from sin.
Moreover, it is to honor God the Creator of All, the fact that you will be resurrected with your material body. He created it, so don't despise it. 

Ok stop here. Now let's see who is who about reincarnation. Guess...... YAZIDIs. Let's give a look at the Reincarnation belief of this group, targeted by the "protestants" of Islam, the "Sunni" ISIS:

 "A belief in the reincarnation of lesser Yazidi souls also exists. Like the Ahl-e Haqq, the Yazidis use the metaphor of a change of garment to describe the process, which they call kiras guhorîn in Kurmanji (changing the garment). Spiritual purification of the soul can be attained via continual reincarnation within the faith group, but it can also be halted by means of expulsion from the Yazidi community; this is the worst possible fate, since the soul's spiritual progress halts and conversion back into the faith is impossible.^[23] Alongside this notion of continuous rebirth, Yazidi theology also includes descriptions of heaven and hell, with hell extinguished, and other traditions incorporating these ideas into a belief system that includes reincarnation.^[64]"
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazidis

"Spiritual purification of the soul can be attained via continual reincarnation within the faith group,".
 Well, this is a LAW. No a faith. "You purify" underlines a voluntary part of your conscience, of your will. Faith is the opposite. You gain faith when you understand you are lost. L-O-S-T. And needy of a Savior.  It is the old good definition of doc Luther (let's put aside for a moment his Roman Catholic anti-semitism), when he clearly told that "man has too short arms to reach God".

But which else group in those regions has a strong belief in Reincarnationism? Guess ....

THE RELIGIOUS GROUP OF BASHAR AL-ASSAD:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alawites
"A succession of coups ensued until, in 1963, a secretive military committee (including Alawite officers Hafez al-Assad and Salah Jadid) helped the Ba'ath Party seize power. In 1966 Alawite-affiliated military officers successfully rebelled and expelled the Ba’ath Party old guard followers of Greek Orthodox Christian Michel Aflaq and Sunni Muslim Salah ad-Din al-Bitar, calling Zaki al-Arsuzi the "Socrates" of the reconstituted Ba'ath Party.
In 1970 Air Force General Hafez al-Assad, an Alawite, took power and instigated a "Correctionist Movement" in the Ba'ath Party. The coup of 1970 ended the political instability which had existed since independence.^[48] Robert D. Kaplan compared Hafez al-Assad's coming to power to "an untouchable becoming maharajah in India or a Jew becoming tsar in Russia—an unprecedented development shocking to the Sunni majority population which had monopolized power for so many centuries".^[41] In 1971 al-Assad declared himself president of Syria, a position the constitution at the time permitted only for Sunni Muslims. In 1973 a new constitution was adopted, replacing Islam as the state religion with a mandate that the president's religion be Islam, and protests erupted.^[49] In 1974, to satisfy this constitutional requirement, Musa as-Sadr (a leader of the Twelvers of Lebanon and founder of the Amal Movement, who had unsuccessfully sought to unite Lebanese Alawites and Shiites under the Supreme Islamic Shiite Council)^[50] issued a fatwa that Alawites were a community of Twelver Shiite Muslims.^[51] Under the authoritarian, secular Assad government, religious minorities were tolerated more than before but political dissidents were not. In 1982, when the Muslim Brotherhood mounted an anti-government Islamist insurgency, Hafez Assad staged a military offensive against them known as the Hama massacre.
(....)
Alawites consider themselves to be Muslims, although some Sunnis dispute that they are.^[52] Alawite doctrine incorporates Gnostic, neo-Platonic, Islamic, Christian and other elements and has, therefore, been described as syncretistic.^[53][54]
(.......)

Reincarnation

Alawites hold that they were originally stars or divine lights that were cast out of heaven through disobedience and must undergo repeated reincarnation (or metempsychosis^[61]) before returning to heaven.^[52][62] They can be reincarnated as Christians or others through sin and as animals if they become infidels.^[52][65]"
 ....".

 

  

 Sunday, February 26, 2012
Are today Russian and Chinese the bayonets of the pope?
http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.it/2012/02/are-today-russian-and-chinese-bayonets.html

 Well, let's see what was thinking about Origen - founding father of the Catholic church (actually not admitted by Rome, because too much revealing of her true colors):

"On his blog, Robin Parry wrote:Did Origen believe in the salvation of the devil? He clearly believed that all rational souls were able to be saved (Contra Celsum 4.99) and this would, on Origen's view of the nature of demonic forces, have included the devil and his demons. So the accusation was stirred up that he taught the salvation of demons. But, in a letter to his friends in Alexandria he explicitly denied that he thought the devil and his demons would be saved. So did he or didn't he? Tricky.

Perhaps the following passage explains how he could maintain both positions:

Peri Archon 3.6.5 (trans. Marguerite Harl, Gilles Dorival, and Alain Le Boulluec. Paris, 1976, p.67) wrote:For the destruction of the last enemy must be understood in this way, not that its substance which was made by God shall perish, but that the hostile purpose and will which proceeded, not from God but from itself, will come to an end. It will be destroyed, therefore, not in the sense of ceasing to exist, but of being no longer an enemy and no longer death. For to the Almighty nothing is impossible, nor is anything beyond the reach of cure by its maker.

(.....)

Gregory of Nyssa was even more bold than Origen on this issue: He maintained that "the originator of evil himself will be healed” (Catechetical Orations 26. The Catechetical Oration of Gregory of Nyssa. Edited by James H. Srawley. Cambridge, 1903, p. 101).
(.....)
accepting the premise of a literal devil and literal demons, i fully agree too. if they aren't real, then it doesn't matter, but if they are, then the last prodigal son coming home i guess will be him...and we'll meet him with forgiveness and rejoicing. what a triumph for God that will be!
(.....)
That's an excellent point. Someone was mocking me on FB a few days ago about the possibility of Hitler being saved, but my wife pointed out that that would be an amazing triumph, a true miracle, showing God's power & glory more than any live demonstration of never ending punishment. That's just Hitler, a fellow sinner like us! Imagine what it will be like when the devil, the author of evil, repents & is converted!!!! Possibly the most amazing triumph ever (the triumph over death is up there too).

Pure 100% anti-Christian - is this the effect of the Jesuits' manipulation among the "Evangelical" and "Baptists" in USA? - see the word of God [Revelation 20 and Mark 9; KJB]:

¹⁰ And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet [are], and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

⁴³ And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:

⁴⁴ Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.

 This guy doesn't say that we have not to boast for believing to be better than Hitler and therefore to gain from that comparison the automatic salvation, he says that if Hitler got saved, well, we all will be saved. End. Can you call that "hypocrisy" or you have a worst label? Check out the words of Jesus Christ our Lord - He died on the cross, if only He had listened to this "Evangellical" guy, He would have renounced to be put on the cross (pardon me Jesus, You know my heart) - Luke, 13:1-5, KJB:

1 There were present at that season some that told him of the Galilaeans, whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices.

2 And Jesus answering said unto them, Suppose ye that these Galilaeans were sinners above all the Galilaeans, because they suffered such things?

3 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.

4 Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and slew them, think ye that they were sinners above all men that dwelt in Jerusalem?

5 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.

This is exactly what distinguish Christendom from other beliefs: don't think that you are less deserving Hell than your executioner. Because Jesus Christ knew the hypocrisy of human heart, that place from which all evilness comes after having been planted by Satan. Jesus, aka God the Son, knew well that human hypocrisy is continually searching a worse neighbor, apparently worse than us, in order to boast the proper alleged salvation. At the end of the story you must find the WORST gu,  who need to be saved, in order to decree  hypocritally as "saved"  the rest of sinful humanity: the guy Satan. 
Tell me now if Satan would agree or not with this "Christian" doctrine.... Of course Satan agrees with this! He created this doctrine, the source of Evil in the world.

 Sunday, September 7, 2014
Were Vaudoises persecuted cause reincarnation?
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/09/were-vaudoises-persecuted-cause.html

 неделя, 12 април 2015 г.
The Resurrection
http://jesus-partisans-balkans.blogspot.it/2015/04/the-resurrection.html

събота, 11 април 2015 г.
the Basilidian gospel of the big bang
http://jesus-partisans-balkans.blogspot.it/2015/04/the-basilidian-gospel-of-big-bang.html

The pope and his harlot: Meridiana.

>
The civil airline company Meridiana is going to lose many workers. 

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3a/MeridianaflyLogo.png/280px-MeridianaflyLogo.png

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meridiana

On October 24 meeting at the Ministry of Labour
Meridiana appeal of Pope Francis: "No to the families without work"

[Notice the "work" of the Council of Trent's doctrine. Jesuits jackals as ever]

The Pope greeted the workers of Meridian in St. Peter's Square. For their situation called for "that one can find an equitable solution that takes into account first of all, the dignity of the human person and the essential need for many families." It will, however, the General Assembly convened in Olbia for tomorrow afternoon, to say the last word on the agreement
 

 http://www.rainews.it/dl/img/2014/10/310x0_1413975093133_rainews_20141022124141261.jpg

   

The Pope in St. Peter greets employees of Meridiana (ANSA)

 
 Vatican City October 22, 2014 "Please, I appeal to all those responsible, no family without work." The Pope Francis said during the general audience about the employees of Meridiana, for which the situation called for "that one can find an equitable solution that takes into account first of all, the dignity of the human person and the essential need for many families" . Shortly before going to the churchyard of St. Peter, Francis fell from truck to greet a large group of workers, all with red t-shirt with the words 'I am a redundant of Meridiana': many were holding the red balloons. Pope Francis has talked to some of them, greeted them, and when he arrived in the square, which in turn was greeted by the waving of red balloons.

And just in Olbia, the strong mistral wind has forced Andrea and Alessandro Mascia Santochini, pilot and flight attendant of Meridiana who from a week are living on a lighting tower to protest the of the Aga Khan company's decision to initiate the procedures  for mobility, to descend from the tower of 20 meters, looking for a makeshift shelter at mid-height. With gusts during the night have near 120 miles per hour was impossible for them to stay on top of the pylon, at 35 meters. That passed was a difficult night for them, but that has not made ​​them desist.

They are so feverish hours for employees in excess of Meridiana. I live on the front of the case, next Friday at 11 am there will be a new and definitive Roman appointment to the Ministry of Labour for the dispute of the second Italian airline. The employees will have to say yes or no to the draft agreement presented yesterday by the Government. Will be the workers, therefore, to decide their own future, but even now from the 35-meter mast lighting gets a fierce 'no' to that agreement by the two employees Meridiana. It will, however, the General Assembly convened in Olbia for tomorrow afternoon to say the last word.

http://www.rainews.it/dl/rainews/articoli/meridiana-appello-di-papa-francesco-no-alle-famiglie-senza-lavoro-san-pietro-citta-vaticano-02c05154-be56-49ec-b048-7c03c3c874f0.html

 
Sorry for the not perfect translation, but I believe it is quite understandable. 

And now, ladies and gentlemen, who is Meridiana? Maybe the female demoniac version of SOPHIA?

 
Meridiana
The lover of the Pope

http://www.taringa.net/posts/info/13137534/Cuernos-magia-fuego-y-curvas-Demonios-femeninos.html 

Female demon that is claimed was loving the chief scholar and mathematician Gerbert of Aurillac, who would become the "millennium Pope" because he held the pontificate between 999 and 1003 under the name of Sylvester II.

During the four years in which the wise presided over the church, struggling with fervor and unsuccessfully against the growing simony that annihilated the institution, [Meridiana] accompanied him and remained his succubus and also attempted to defeat the spirit merchants.

The legend says that her love and respect for him were so intense, that she gave up immortality to follow him to the grave, and to rest on a side of the coffin containing the remains of Sylvester, in the Roman basilica of St. John Lateran.

From time to time, as a sign or testimony that no one has been able to interpret, from the common grave of the lovers emerges a kind of sweat....."

As pertain the gnostic allegory I will not deepen the matter here and will leave you to another source where all is completely exposed. 

I want to focus on the French origin of Sylvester II and his attempts to a sort of 'reform' of the church. All that speaks loud about  how much the Catholic institutions were at pains in to deal with the various Christian anti-Catholic denominations, Paterni, Vaoudoises, Albigenses etc. A French pope, coming from an area near the hotbed of anti-Catholicism, a pope fighting against the sins of the church was an attempt to appease the great opposition from the Christians in the society, who were gaining scores against the propaganda of the Catholics cause the depravation of the Catholic church, presided by an Anticrist named "the pope". 

 A century after, in 1095, there was the first crusade against the Islam and also this was a significant event. The practically censored existence of the anti-Catholic Christendom, parallel to the official church of Satan (of the popes) would explain the crusades also as way to aggregate the Catholic monarchies, at least partially influenced by the existence of Patareni, Vaudoises, Albigenses, and to try to divert their attention from the issue of the genuinity of the Catholicism as pertain the attainment of that doctrine to God's word. 

Only some decades later the Catholic gnosticism receives a military form with the creation of the Templars:

".......The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon (Latin: Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique Salomonici), commonly known as the Knights Templar, the Order of the Temple (French: Ordre du Temple or Templiers) or simply as Templars, were among the most wealthy and powerful of the Western Christian military orders^[4] and were among the most prominent actors of the Christian finance. The organisation existed for nearly two centuries during the Middle Ages........"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Templar

That reference to Solomon and hence to Proverb:1:7 you find on the header of this post, was a perversion of the God's doctrine trying to manipulate the God's word in the attempt of Gnostic worship whose beatiful example is that Masonic fable about the lover of pope Sylvester II. 

Worth to note how neo-platonic gnosticims (intellectualization of Satanism) started to officially persecute the Christians not far from that period of time:

"......The Inquisition is^[1] a group of institutions within the judicial system of the Roman Catholic Church whose aim is to combat heresy. It started in 12th-century France to combat the spread of religious sectarianism, in particular the Cathars and the Waldensians. Among the other groups which were investigated later were the Spiritual Franciscans, the Hussites (followers of Jan Hus) and Beguines............."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition

Also today the pope declared an holy war on a kind of Islam, the ISIS, and if you observe also this could be partially a sort of answer to the previous difficulties coming from the pedophilia issue. The images of beheaded Iraqi children to make forget the ones raped by the priests of the Catholic church. 1000 years before the crusades had to put in oblivion the total depravation of the church, covering the Satanism of the priests with the tales of bloody battles with the infidel Muslim. The techniques of the Synagogue of Satan (Saint Peter church) are not changed in 1000 years.

But we can say more about. Sylvester II is not 'second' for a case. It alluded to the second millenium. And today we have a pope which is alluding to the first true pope of Rome, the emperor Augustus, who was also Pontifex Maximus, two millenumns before:

"......Thus, from the time of Augustus, the election of pontifices ended and membership into the sacred college was deemed a sign of imperial favour.^[3] With this attribution, the new office of Emperor was given a religious dignity and the responsibility for the entire Roman state cult. Most authors contend that the power of naming the Pontifices was not really used as an instrumentum regni, an enforcing power.......". URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontifex_Maximus#Roman_Empire

[excerpt quoted in my: http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/07/obsessed-with-flood-8-two-millenniums.html ]

Pope Augustus, Sylvester II and Francis I now. I mean: does pope Bergoglio SJ believe to be the same incarnated soul of his two previous colleagues? Being his church based on Origen's neo-platonism and being Origen a reincarnationist,  it could be true [I am  not a reincarnationist but resurrectionist]. The question is: if the Vaudoises and all the other Christian persecuted denominations, as pertain my knowledge, were never accused to believe in the Reincarnation, was maybe exactly for the opposite reason that Catholicism raged on them? Because they denied what popes and bishops secretly considered a central dogma of their gnostic religion?

http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/09/were-vaudoises-persecuted-cause.html

"Meridiana. The lover of Pope Sylvester II - Beings of the Night - World of Fantasy"

Above image - URL: http://imagenespreferidas.blogspot.it/2012/11/meridiana-la-amante-del-papa-silvestre.html

 
I suggest to you, if you want to get a clear image of this Catholic neo-platonic gnosticism where "Meridiana" may represent Gnosis or SOPHIA, to check the blog of Christo Stiliyanov:

петък, 3 октомври 2014 г.

The [false] fall of the Harlot - Simon Francis ( part1 ) 

http://jesus-partisans-balkans.blogspot.it/2014/10/the-fall-of-harlot-simon-francis-part1.html

Were Vaudoises persecuted cause reincarnation?

>

      I never heard of a single accusation against an anti-popish Christian in the 1500 years of open persecutions against the Vaudoises (Novatian, Patereni, Anabaptists, Picards, Albigenses, etc.), to profess the belief in Reincarnation. But at the opposite, if they were slaughtered it was for well completely different beliefs....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origen

Anathemas (544, 553)

While Patriarch Mennas of Constantinople condemned Origen and a form of apocatastasis at the Synod of Constantinople (543); experts are divided whether the Second Council of Constantinople (the Fifth Ecumenical Council) in 553 ratified the condemnation authentically as "It is [only] certain that the council opened on 5 May, 553, in spite of the protestations of Pope Vigilius, who though at Constantinople refused to attend it, and that in the eight conciliary sessions (from 5 May to 2 June), the Acts of which we possess, only the question of the Three Chapters is treated."^[13] Many heteroclite views became associated with Origen, and the 15 anathemas attributed to the council condemn a form of apocatastasis along with the pre-existence of the soul, animism (a heterodox Christology), and a denial of real and lasting resurrection of the body.^[59] Some authorities believe these anathemas belong to an earlier local synod.^[60] The anathema against Origen in his person, declaring him (among others) a heretic, reads as follows:

If anyone does not anathematize Arius, Eunomius, Macedonius, Apollinaris, Nestorius, Eutyches and Origen, as well as their impious writings, as also all other heretics already condemned and anathematized by the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, and by the aforesaid four Holy Synods and [if anyone does not equally anathematize] all those who have held and hold or who in their impiety persist in holding to the end the same opinion as those heretics just mentioned: let him be anathema.^[61]

(...........)

Origen in the 1970s

In Reincarnation in Christianity (1978), theosophist Geddes MacGregor asserts that Origen believed in reincarnation and taught about it, but that his texts written about the subject have been destroyed.^[65]
(......)Origen is regarded by the Roman Catholic Church as a Church Father, but not a Saint.^[73]

From:

THE HISTORY OF THE
CHRISTIAN CHURCH
by William Jones
B o o k s F o r T h e A g e s
AGES Software • Albany, OR USA
Hartland Publications • Rapidan, VA USA
Version 1.0 © 1997

".....Farther, the provincial councils of Toulouse, in 1119, and of Lombez, in
1176, and the general councils of Lateran in 1139, and 1179, do not treat of
them, nor condemn them as Albigenses but as heretics, and when they
paricularize them, they denominate them “bons hommet”—(i.e. good
men)—“Cathari”—“Paterini”—“Publicani,” etc. which shows that they
existed before they were generally known as Albigenses. It is also proved,
from their books, that they existed as Waldenses, before the times of Peter
Waldo, who preached about the year 1160. Perrin, who wrote their
history, had in his possession a New Testament in the Vallese language,
written on parchment, in a very ancient letter, and a book entitled in their
language, “Qual cosa sia l’Antichrist”—that is, “What is Antichrist?”
under date of the year 1120, which carries us back at least twenty years
before Waldo. Another book entitled, “The Noble Lesson” —is dated A.D.
1100.
Their enemies confirm their great antiquity. Reinerius Saccho, an
inquisitor, and one of their most implacable enemies, who lived only eighty
years after Waldo, admits that the Waldenses flourished five hundred years
before that preacher. Gretzer, the Jesuit, who also wrote against the
Waldenses, and had examined the subject fully, not only admits their great
antiquity, but declares his firm belief that the Toulousians and Albigenses
condemned in the years 1177, and 1178, were no other than Waldenses. In
fact, their doctrine, discipline, government, manners, and even the errors
with which they have been charged (by the Catholics,) show that the
Albigenses and Waldenses were distinct branches of the same sect, or that
the former were sprung from the latter.4
From the death of Claude, bishop of Turin, who may not improperly be
termed the Wickliff of that city, to the times of Peter Waldo of Lyons, a
considerable period intervened, during which, the history of the disciples
of that great man is involved in much obscurity. They seem to have had no
writers among themselves capable of detailing their proceedings during this
period; or, if any records of their ecclesiastical history were committed to
writing, the zeal of their opponents hath prevented their transmission to
our times. In the writings of their adversaries, indeed, we have abundant
14
proof of their existence, as a class of Christians separated in faith and
practice from the catholic church, and of the multiplication of their
numbers; but of their proceedings in the formation of churches, and of their
order, worship, and discipling, we are very imperfectly informed....."

"....Reinerius Saccho, an
inquisitor, and one of their most implacable enemies, who lived only eighty
years after Waldo, admits that the Waldenses flourished five hundred years
before that preacher."...

1160 - 500 = 660

...aka little more than one century after the " Second Council of Constantinople (the Fifth Ecumenical Council) in 553", where they probably "ratified the condemnation" of Origen's doctrine.

Above image - The Eastern Roman Empire at the age of the Second Council of Constantinople (alleged comdenation of Origen). Notice how it was including North Italy, Piedmont, Lombardy (Milan) and a good part of the Italian Alps.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9b/Justinian555AD.png

     Origen's theology - allegedly together with his Reincarnationism -  if condemned, was condemned because the Catholic church, with her abominable apostasy, cruel blasphemies and satanic heresies was dangerously stirring up a Christian reaction, offering to the true followers of the Christ's Gospel valid arguments in to open the eyes of the people against the incommensurable spiritual corruption of the priests of Rome.

      Vaudoises, Patareni, Picards, Anabaptists, etc. didn't suffer the persecution of the church of Rome because they believed in the "transmigration of the souls", but because they righteously believed you have only one life at disposition given by God in order to surrender yourself not to the pope and his evil church, but to the precious blood shed by Jesus Christ the Lord. 

 "......The country in which we find the earliest of these Protesters is Italy. The See of Rome, in those days, embraced only the capital and the surrounding provinces. The diocese of Milan, which included the plain of Lombardy, the Alps of Piedmont, and the southern provinces of France, greatly exceeded it in extent.[1] It is an undoubted historical fact that this powerful diocese was not then tributary to the Papal chair. "The Bishops of Milan," says Pope Pelagius I. (555), "do not come to Rome for ordination." He further informs us that this "was an ancient custom of theirs."[2]
......." [by James A. Wylie]

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Anabaptist bread. With Catholic leaven. http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/06/anabaptist-bread-with-catholic-leaven.html