".... All the orders were given either by the US embassy or by Jan Tombinski, a Polish representative who worked in the EU mission in Kiev. Poland played an invaluable role in the coup. It has always dreamt of restoring its former power and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. ....".
[ a statement by Major General Alexander Yakimenko, February 2014 - see link before References ]
* * *
"Belarus’ special forces were involved in training Anders Breivik"(1/1)starvosan:
http://en.rian.ru/world/20110728/165436665.html
Norway’s twin terror suspect Anders Behring Breivik trained at a secret paramilitary field camp in Belarus earlier this year, a Belarusian opposition politician said on Thursday, citing security sources.
“Breivik visited Belarus several times. This spring, as part of his preparations for his twin attacks, he visited Minsk, where he underwent training at a secret paramilitary field camp,” Mikhail Reshetnikov, the head of the opposition Belarusian Party of Patriots, told the Gazeta.ru online newspaper. ...
Reshetnikov also claimed Breivik had participated in “sabotage-terrorism drills” under a former Belarusian special service officer and that he had used a fake passport to enter Belarus.
“His codename in Belarus’s KGB was Viking,” he added. ....
This of course makes it all but certain that Breivik was on the proverbial "watch list" of several intelligence agencies, most definitely that of Norway too. It is now going to be increasingly difficult to maintain the 'lone gunman' theory they are pushing.
KGB: Russian Media Lied about Breivik’s Actions in Belarus
URL: http://telegraf.by/en/2012/03/kgb-rossiiskie-smi-solgali-o-deistviyah-breivika-v-belarusi
Head of Centre for Information and Public Relations of KGB of Belarus Alexander Antonovich said on March 2 that the media had spread unverified information about the visit of Norwegian terrorist Anders Breivik to Belarus. "Unverified information was used by some media, including the website "Gazeta.ru" and the television station NTV, seeking for a sensation out of the fictional, totally unverified information," he said.According to him, in the request, sent to Belarus in the case against Breivik, the Norwegian law enforcement officers asked to interview Mikhail Reshetnikov, who had actively disseminated information on the presence of terrorists in Belarus. In particular, they wanted to know whether he’d met Breivik before, whether he knew anything about his travels, plans, political and religious convictions or any groups, Breivik could be a part of, BelTA informs.
However, since 2007, Mikhail Reshetnikov has been outside Belarus, possibly in Spain. September 28, 2010, he was put on the international wanted list on charges of committing crimes in 2007, under Part 4 of Article 210 of the Criminal Code of Belarus (embezzlement through abuse of office on a large scale). He is accused of embezzling a large sum of money of one of the enterprises.
According to the KGB, Mikhail Reshetnikov was deliberately spreading false information about Belarus to pass himself off as a political refugee to quickly obtain foreign citizenship. That information was used by the media.
Alexander Antonovich says that the Belarusian law enforcers found that Breivik arrived at National Airport Minsk by flight OS-687 from the airport of Vienna on March 4, 2005. He didn’t stay long in Belarus and left the country for Warsaw by flight LOT-706 on March 11. According to the KGB, Breivik Belarus did not attend in other periods.
The representative of the KGB said that Anders Breivik had been in touch with Nadezhda Rutkovskaya in Minsk, who lived in the district Uruchcha. "It is a former military town. Ultimately, this circumstance, as far as we know, was the occasion for the dissemination of information about Breivik’s location near a military base or at a military base," he said.
In February 2009, the Belarusian woman went to Germany. Now she lives in the U.S. North Carolina with her family.
As Telegraf previously reported, at the request of the Attorney General of Norway, the district prosecutor's office of Oslo sent an official enquiry on a stay of Norwegian terrorist Anders Breivik in the territory of Belarus to the Prosecutor General of Belarus. [end of article]
A lie, but spread only six days after the massacre???
"...Breivik ‘underwent paramilitary training in Belarus’
URL: http://en.ria.ru/world/20110728/165436665.html
18:27 28/07/2011
Norway’s twin terror suspect Anders Behring Breivik trained at a secret paramilitary field camp in Belarus earlier this year, a Belarusian opposition politician said on Thursday, citing security sources.
“Breivik visited Belarus several times. This spring, as part of his preparations for his twin attacks, he visited Minsk, where he underwent training at a secret paramilitary field camp,” Mikhail Reshetnikov, the head of the opposition Belarusian Party of Patriots, told the Gazeta.ru online newspaper.
He cited sources within Belarus’s “security organs.”
Breivik, 32, has admitted to carrying out a bombing in Oslo, which killed eight, and a mass shooting at a Labor Party youth camp on the nearby island of Utoya, which left 68 dead. He has not accepted criminal responsibility, however, saying his actions were "atrocious but necessary" measures intended to "save Norway and Western Europe" from a "Muslim takeover."
Breivik mentioned in his online manifesto visiting Belarus to study the effects of fallout from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster. The former Soviet republic’s state border agency has confirmed he was in Belarus from March 4 to March 11, 2005.
Reshetnikov also claimed Breivik had participated in “sabotage-terrorism drills” under a former Belarusian special service officer and that he had used a fake passport to enter Belarus.
“His codename in Belarus’s KGB was Viking,” he added. “Rumors say he also had a girlfriend in Belarus.”
“The theory that Belarus’ special forces were involved in training Anders Breivik seems, of course, far-fetched,” political expert Viktor Demidov was quoted by Gazeta.ru as saying.
“On the other hand, [Belarusian] President Alexander Lukashenko’s friendship with Muammar Gaddafi is no secret - neither is his fondness for Adolf Hitler.”
Norway is taking part in NATO operations in Libya and Gaddafi has threatened attacks against Europe.
........."
"......Breivik trained in Belarus 6
URL: http://theatheistconservative.com/2011/08/05/breivik-trained-in-belarus/Posted under Commentary, Eastern Europe, Europe, News, Russia, Soviet Union, Terrorism, tyranny by Jillian Becker on Friday, August 5, 2011
New information about Anders Brievik, the Norwegian terrorist, is being published in erstwhile Soviet satellite countries – that he underwent militant-terrorist training in (post-Soviet but still communist) Belarus.
According to this report he was trained under a former colonel of Belarusian special forces, Valery Lunev.
Eastern European feeds are full of details of Breivik’s multiple trips to Belarus, changes in his behavior and wealth, and the training he underwent in Belarusian militant camps. In fact, Belarus’ tight government regime and active intelligence have served a great purpose this time around. … Belarusian KGB kept precise records on Breivik, who was called “Viking” in the intelligence reports. …Who paid him? To do what?
It appears that the Norwegian terrorist underwent the militant-terrorist training under the guidance of 51-year-old Valery Lunev, a former colonel of Belarusian special forces, who now lives in Netherlands but regularly visits Belarus. According to Mikhail Reshetnikov, the Head of the Party of Belarus Patriots who is familiar with the intelligence records, “Breivik visited Belarus three times. Last Spring, while actively preparing for the terrorist attacks, he entered Poland with his own passport, and then travelled to Minsk under a passport of another European country. He recently got a Belarusian girlfriend and obtained access to significant amounts of money.”
His targets were members of a Russia-friendly left-wing Norwegian political party. How did his terrorist actions against them serve the interests of communist Belarus?
It is an impoverished state with a “Soviet-style economy”, ruled by a man who, according to the BBC (which is not unfriendly to collectivist tyrannies), is a nasty tyrant:
[Belarus] has been ruled with an increasingly iron fist since 1994 by President Alexander Lukashenko. Opposition figures are subjected to harsh penalties for organising protests.Seems Master Putin may be choosing another class favorite:
In early 2005, Belarus was listed by the US as Europe’s only remaining “outpost of tyranny”. In late 2008, there were some signs of a slight easing of tensions with the West, though this proved to be only a temporary thaw. ..
In the Soviet post-war years, Belarus became one of the most prosperous parts of the USSR, but with independence came economic decline. President Lukashenko has steadfastly opposed the privatisation of state enterprises. Private business is virtually non-existent. Foreign investors stay away.
For much of his career, Mr Lukashenko has sought to develop closer ties with Russia. On the political front, there was talk of union but little tangible evidence of progress, and certainly not toward the union of equals envisaged by President Lukashenko.
Belarus remains heavily dependent on Russia to meet its own energy needs and a considerable proportion of Russian oil and gas exports to Europe pass through it.
Relations with Russia deteriorated sharply in the summer of 2010, with disputes over energy pricing, customs union terms and the presence in Belarus of ousted Kyrgyz president Bakiyev, prompting speculation that Moscow might switch support from Lukashenko to another leadership candidate.In Russia and Eastern Europe, it seems, plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose!
There is a mystery here. Does Belarus just train anybody who applies to become a terrorist, regardless of the use he intends to put his training to, or the objectives he has in mind? That would mean that Lukashenko (remember nothing official happens in a tyranny without the tyrant ordaining it) simply wants to promote general chaos.
If not that, what particular Belarusian or Russian interests was Breivik serving? Did Lukashenko want to strike a very indirect blow against Putin by hurting his Norwegian fans?
Perhaps Breivik misled his trainers. Perhaps he told them he intended to bomb the US embassy in Oslo.
With what’s been revealed, there’s plenty of scope for conjecture but little certainty. Rather, uncertainty grows.
And it’s unlikely that explanations will come out of Belarus. None, anyway, that a savvy observer would trust.
Footnote: Of course the whole story of Breivik being trained in Belarus could be “disinformation”, a term coined during the Cold War meaning: false information, spread for mischievous ends through obscure channels on the chance of it’s reaching and deceiving the enemy’s mainstream media and intelligence agencies.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Tagged with Anders Breivik, Belarusian KGB gave Breivik the cover-name "Viking", Belarusian KGB kept records on Anders Breivik, Breivik trained as a terrorist in Belarus, Colonel Valery Lunev, Mikhail Reshetnikov, Party of Belarus Patriots, President Alexander Lukashenko
This post has 6 comments.
.............."
* * *
Utøya Massacre also as part of the aggression against Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine of today. The dismissed detail of the Belarus travels of Anders Breivik is a clear evidence that the murder of Lech Kazynsky and other 95 people (Smolensk April 2010) was only the intro for what is happening today. That info has been spread (probably threatening in some ways a framed Mikhail Reshetnikov) with the intention to be then "debunked" very easily as "disinformation" of the enemy. As the principal ally of Norway is Putin's Russia, it was warm interest of Oslo and Moscow in to present themselves as "victims of disinformation". This time together the usual Zionism it was involved also the Old Lithuania, today "Belarus". The still warm blood of those 77 anti-Zionists fighters at Utøya island has been - with this false info - poured over the figure of assassinated Lech Kazynsky who was supporter of a more strict alliance with Ukraine in the spirit of the heritage of the old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and did very much to spread the memory of the Holocaust among the young generations of Poles. In to spread what seems to be the lie that Anders Breivik has been trained in a country which is the grave where is buried that Lithuania and a country which is the Banana Republic of Putin's Russia, is a very refined way in to indicate again Poland and the supporters of the old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as among the masterminds of the Utøya Massacre.
"...Friday, April 20, 2012 12:50 am, Posted by editor 0 | Courts, Foreign Affairs, NB8 (Nordic/Baltic), Politics
A.Breivik had a bank account in Snoras
Anders Breivik’s connection with Lithuania has been revealed. In the court, held in Oslo on Wednesday, the extremist terrorist admitted that he had been in Lithuania in January 2004 for 25 hours and opened a bank account in “Snoras”, delfi.lt reports.
Prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh announced that the ultranationalist radical, responsible for murdering 77 people, had spent 25 hours in Lithuania 8 years ago. A.Breivik left the country on January 21 after opening a bank account in “Snoras”.
According to the case file, 20 thousand dollars were transferred to his bank account from an American company. The defendant claimed to have forgotten about that.
Earlier reports indicated Breivik was involved in forgery business and money laundering. For this reason, he had bank accounts in foreign banks.
Source: http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/12172/a-breivik-had-a-bank-account-in-snoras-201212172/
....."
Is this the truth behind??... Before to assassinate the governing elite of Poland in 2010 they disseminated the country of the Old Commonwealth with abundant traces of Anders Breivik. They needed to frame Poland and Lithuanian elite in order so, when time will come to assassinate Lech Kazynsky and other 95 people and to attack Ukraine, to get a sort of "insurance", if something would have gone wrong they could tell that... "behind the Massacre of Utøya island there were also Poland and Lithuania, together with the Mossad, as a Polish-Lithuanian revenge for the Smolensk 2010 air crash".
* * *
Friday, April 4, 2014
From the Strait of Hormuz to the Arctic circle
Friday, March 21, 2014
Aleksandr Yakimenko's open confession of EU-Putin Pact 2014
Aleksandr Yakimenko's open confession of EU-Putin Pact 2014
By Douglas Willinger:
.jpg)
Saturday, December 28, 2013
--------------REFERENCES:
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
Reflection and resumee [with an excursion in Beslan, etape of Big Enlargement]
>
A reflection on what is happening to the public (secular) health system in the peninsula and in the Western world at the light of the theological war going on, and a short resume about the facts of Oslo.(.......)As the intelligence Romish cartoon “Andrew Breivik” announced the existence of other “cells”, and as the authorities are considering the massacre a crime against humanity, expect in the future other similar events with many other emulators of Breivik, of course traumatic events just assembled and stored in the secret hangars of the Romish Masonic Euro(po)pean community and ready to be used to build the next step of the community, the Terrorist/Social Fascist Euro(po)pean community.For this reason the 'alternative' both anti-Jewish as well anti-Jesuit information continue to support the principal pillar of this strategy, which is based on the manipulation of the language, proposing for the eternity the false terminology of the "false flag" attack, meanwhile the best definition for such attacks should be the one like "mirror-event", where a subject defined by the 'official' propaganda world system reflects the wanted ideological/religious image on an mirror-event purposely engineered (911, MO, Russian terrorist trauma, Gaza, etc.) whose ideological/religious properties of reflectance are elaborated/manipulated by the 'alternative' information which will create the desired reflected image commissioned by Rome.Unfortunately I too contributed to this mind distortion, as I the same termed the MO as "722", on the stream of the best manipulative tradition of the "911 de-bunking". More than the 911, the Massacre of Oslo contains elements for another deja vu, this time coming from east....:
Above image - "Beslan: Has the truth been told ?" - URL: http://www.viddler.com/explore/frontlineclub/videos/133/
............... . . . . . . . . .
Saturday, August 06, 2011
Flags for the enlargement
http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2011/08/flags-for-enlargement.html
Legend for three above images
1) the Right Arm of Rome imposing the Big Enalrgement to Eurasia
2) Beslan 2004 - "Beslan: 5 Years Later and the Jihad Still Growing in Russia Today is the 5th anniversary of the Beslan massacre. I'd almost forgotten." URL: http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/198663.php
3) Otoy, Oslo, 22 Jul 2011: Deja vu? - "DA LEE OSWALD A LEE OSLO, VIA “GLADIO” ?" - URL: http://www.comedonchisciotte.org/site/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=8676
(PS: I had problems especially with the uploading of the Oslo's Otoyas island massacre picture..... Does It hit their nerves the comparison?....: "The connection has timed out
The server at us.data.toolbar.yahoo.com is taking too long to respond.
The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few
moments.
If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network
connection.
If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure
that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.").
............... . . . . . . . . .
URL: http://www.pravdabeslana.ru/truth.htm
The Truth About BeslanMarina LitvinovichA report entitled Beslan: The Hostages’ Truth compiled by Yuriy Savelev, a State Duma deputy and member of the parliamentary commission investigating the terrorist attack, was published today on the Pravda Beslana (Beslan’s Truth) web site www.pravdabeslana.ru. This report, the “special opinion” which other investigators did not agree with, is practically the only voice of reason on the parliamentary commission, as the official version of events directly contradicts not only the evidence of the hostages and witnesses, but even the laws of physics and explosives.Yuriy Petrovich Savelev is a doctor of technical sciences, a highly qualified expert on the physics of combustion and explosions, a professor and former rector of St Petersburg’s Institute of Military Mechanics, the only specialist of his kind on the commission.In May-June this year Savelev familiarised other members of the parliamentary commission and a range of experts with his report. Making practically no substantial objections, they described his conclusions as “deliberate falsification of the data” and “speculation”. The chairman of the commission, A. Torshin, accused Savelev of “playing political games”. The reaction to the report can be easily explained: Savelev not only completely destroys the official version of the terrorist attack in Beslan (the version of the Prosecutor’s Office which was repeated by A. Torshin in his December 2005 report), but also proves the terrible truth: the hostages died not through the fault of the terrorists, but through the fault of the HQ’s actions. Not simply the actions but the criminal order given by one of the HQ’s FSB generals.Yuriy Savelev’s report is voluminous, packed with evidence, calculations, formulas and photographic proof. The author pays a lot of attention to the testimonies of the surviving hostages, witnesses and eyewitnesses. These testimonies were given in open court during the trial of Nurpashi Kulayev at the Supreme Court of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania. Stenographic records of the trial, which were published quickly on the www.pravdabeslana.ru web site, allowed any interested party to delve into the circumstances of events in Beslan. The details repeated by the former hostages provided material to understand the events of 1-3 September 2004 and especially the events that set in motion the storming of the school on 3 September. Moreover, Savelev based his report on the large archive of photographic and video material from the scene of the tragedy which was put together with the help of reporters who worked in Beslan. It is not easy to paraphrase the report either in terms of its scope or its base of scientific evidence, so I will restrict myself in this article to just the main conclusions.The first part of the report is devoted to the circumstances surrounding the explosions in the school sports hall, which were heard after 13.00 on 3 September 2004 and after which the “enforced storming” began. The official version runs: “The unidentified terrorists activated explosive devices rigged up in the school sports hall.” The investigation proceeded from this version, conducting expert analyses in explosives and fires. Savelev pays a great deal of attention in his report to criticism of these analyses. Taking as a basis the repeated evidence of the hostages, the investigation of the nature and timing of the destruction in the sports hall, the used casings from single-shot weapons, which were found by local residents and handed in to the prosecutor’s office, and photographic records and using formulas to calculate the strength of the explosions, the author of the report draws his conclusions. The first explosion in the sports hall, packed with weak hostages, was the result of a shot from an RPO-A (rocket-propelled infantry flame-thrower with a thermobaric action, in other words a Shmel flame-thrower) from the five-storey House No 37 in School Lane. The shot was fired at 13.03 into the northeast corner of the attic space of the sports hall, which adjoins the gym. As the FSB did not reply to the official enquiry of the parliamentary commission, the author admits that in this case an RPO-A might not have been used, but a TBG-7V grenade (RPG-7V1 grenade thrower), RShG-2 (rocket-propelled assault grenade) or an MPO-A (although at that time this type of weapon might not yet have been in the armoury of the Russian Federation FSB’s special centre). As the shot was made by a thermobaric grenade with a simplified charge, then it is likely that a weapon of the types mentioned with similar specifications was used.The second explosion in the sports hall, which was heard 22 seconds later, was caused by a high explosive splinter grenade, with an equivalent of 6.1 kg of TNT, fired from an RShG-1 grenade thrower in the five-storey House No 41 in School Lane. The shot destroyed the wall beneath the northern window’s sill, close to the western wall of the sports hall.It is important to note that a significant number of the explosive devices rigged up by the fighters in the sports hall did not explode, while some of them did explode as a result of the raging fire. A large number of the hostages in the sports hall died precisely as a result of the first two explosions. Some of the survivors managed to run out of the sports hall, while after the explosions others were taken by the fighters into the school’s canteen, assembly hall and southern wing. The fighters moved the people because a fire had started in the sports hall and had taken hold very quickly. The fire in the sports hall started as a result of the first shot, practically at 13.05, as the school’s attic area, ceiling rafters and lagging had begun to burn where the thermobaric grenade fell. The burning rafters and lagging fell onto the wounded, but still living, hostages. The order of the head of the operational HQ, FSB Maj-Gen V.A. Andreyev, to extinguish the fire came at 15.10, the first water at 15.28, that is, two and a half hours after the start of the fire. In this time all the hostages who remained in the sports hall were burnt. Helpless and wounded, they were burnt alive.A better fate did not await those who were moved from the sports hall to other parts of the school. All parts of the school except for the sports hall came under fire from outside from Shmel flame throwers, RPG-26 and RShG-2 grenade throwers, other weapons and also from tanks. Yuriy Savelev has calculated from the investigation’s official documents and forensic reports that approximately 300 to 310 hostages were taken from the sports hall to other parts of the school and that approximately 106 to 110 of them died.The report contains many other convincing expositions and conclusions. I have mentioned only the basic ones. The main conclusion is: the storming of the school in Beslan was engineered (begun) by the use of weapons by the Russian special services, specifically the team from the operational HQ. However, the storming was presented to us as “enforced”, that is, begun after “the fighters blew up the sports hall”. Savelev proves in his report that this is not true.Why did events turn out this way? What was the logic and what were the circumstances that made the HQ fire several times into the sports hall and then begin the assault? I have been asking myself this question for a long time. This is my theory. First, it has to be taken into account that there were in fact two “operational headquarters”: one, termed by convention “the power-wielding structures or heavies”, which included the federal FSB, and the other “civilian”, which included the leaders of the republic, deputies, and also regional, Ossetian heavies of a lower rank. From 1 September the “heavies” HQ was preparing the assault, while the “civilian” HQ was looking for a peaceful resolution of the situation through negotiations. In many ways the “heavies” restricted the actions of the “civilians” (in particular in their attempts to negotiate with the fighters) and also took pains to assure everyone that “there will be no storming”.From the very beginning the local population and relatives of the hostages in the school were very afraid of an assault by force. Representatives of the “civilian HQ” went out to meet people and assure them that “there will be no storming”. But they were not really believed: the degree of mistrust of officialdom was outstripped by the lies of the HQ and mass media (especially the federal TV channels) about the number of hostages – all three days it was reported that there were 354 of them, although by the afternoon of 1 September the number was known to be “more than 1,000” (members of the HQ - the Russian Federation president’s deputy press secretary, Dmitriy Peskov, and the deputy director of the “Vesti”(“News”) department for information and the press, Pyotr Vasilyev - “filtered” the information for the media). Ossetian men literally formed a living ring around the school in order to prevent an attack by the military. They were armed with whatever they could find, even with rare weapons from the Second World War.But while the “civilian” HQ was thinking about ways of holding negotiations, the “heavies” were preparing to storm the school. It should be noted that the “civilian” HQ even achieved some success in their work – agreement was reached on the arrival of Maskhadov whom they promised to let into the school. He was guaranteed a corridor and airfield. An hour after these agreements were reached, the storm of the school began.The “heavies” HQ faced a “difficult” task: how can they storm the school if local residents will see this straightaway and get in the way of the work of the special units? The decision was taken then: 1. to engineer the assault; 2. to make it look as though the fighters themselves blew up the sports hall; 3. to this end to fire several times into the sports hall (into the attic, under the hall’s window and into the window); 4. to begin the assault with special forces; 5. to distract the attention of the fighters before firing into the sports hall (it had been agreed that forces from the Emergencies Ministry would collect bodies thrown out of the school window). This was the plan. This was the chronology: the Emergencies Ministry drives up to collect the bodies, at 13.03 explosions are heard in the sports hall, special forces begin “the enforced storming”. The local population does not get in the way of the troops and themselves rush to drag the hostages out of the sports hall.I am sure that only a few people knew the details of this operation. I am sure that this operation was devised by the FSB. Most likely the generals knew about this operation – at that time they were deputy FSB directors V. Pronichev, V. Anisimov and A. Tikhonov who were in Beslan and leading the “heavies” HQ. And of course the operation was agreed with President Putin, perhaps without the details, but in principle: “A storming and no negotiations”. A source in the presidential administration reported that President Putin took the decision in principle to storm the Beslan school at roughly midday on 1 September 2004. History does not forget such decisions.The author is the editor-in-chief of the Pravda Beslana web site.28.08.2006
-------------------------------------------------
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)
