Saturday, November 16, 2013

SCIENTIFIC CHANNEL MAKES PROPAGANDA OF ALIEN AGENDA IN MAXIMUM AUDIENCE HOUR!!!

>





The channel Focus, of the magazine scientific Focus, makes open propaganda of the Alien agenda : "ALIEN CREATED MAN".

Incredible!!! David Icke propaganda at the hour of maximum audience, when people has dinner!!! At 7 PM!!!

I just watched part of "documentary" today Saturday 16th November 2013 where many of "experts" were telling the spectator about the Zecharia Sitchin and his Sumerian, Nibiru, Annunaki, ALIEN KIDNAPPING, and everything of the most trendy fashion you can remember to have ever herd about Aliens and UFO in the last thirty years! The format was repeating the Alien agenda without to put a serious doubt, practically a brainwash filled with lies and super-evolutionism  religion and this by the the most "rationale" and "scientific" channel existing in TV!!!

IF ALIEN CREATED THE MAN, IF THEY ARE KIDNAPPING PART OF HUMANITY TO CREATE HYBRIDS, HOW IS THAT THEY ARE IMPOTENT RESPECT SUCH DOCUMENTARIES WHICH PRETEND TO "EXPOSE THE ALIENS"???? 

We are now facing the most complete farce, equal only to the ones of the National Socialist propaganda on the "superior race" (Aryans and Aliens are equivalent) or "superior class" (Marxism).

Remember that as it is evident that life was not generated spontaneously, they have to move the creation of life on another planet. THIS IS WHY THEY CREATED THE ALIEN AGENDA, AND JULUS VERNE AND HG WELLS WERE THE ANCESTOR WORKING FOR SUCH AGENDA (just mind they were contemporary with the BIRTH OF EVOLUTION THEORY OF C. DARWIN....).

More to come in the next days!

See video promotional of FOCUS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch2iedwAs1g

"FOCUS | Canale 56 Digitale Terrestre" 

 http://www.focus.it/scienza/focus-in-tv-sul-56_C12.aspx



Thursday, November 14, 2013

The Mafia of Evolutionism

>
".....J: "Just stop right there. To be a molecular biologist requires one to hold on to two insanities at all times. One, it would be insane to believe in evolution when you can see the truth for yourself. Two, it would be insane to say you don't believe in evolution. All government work, research grants, papers, big college lectures - everything would stop. I'd be out of a job, or relegated to the outer fringes where I couldn't earn a decent living."........". [excerpt from: http://www.bible.ca/tracks/textbook-fraud-biologist.htm]

-----STOP-----



 
Often they tell you about X ray or Gamma ray in the sky as sign of monstrous objects like black holes, quasars, neutron stars, etc.

"Only in-immaginable bursts of energy can produce such high frequencies" they tell you.

But what if the same X and Gamma rays would be produced in natural processes on earth? If a thunderstorm and its lightning produce X and Gamma rays, does it mean they have a black hole inside???
 
"Japanese team sees gamma-ray pulse before lightning flash" [references]


--------------------REFERENCES:

 http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/jul/10/japanese-team-sees-gamma-ray-pulse-before-lightning-flash

".....As the researchers used several detectors, they were also able to work out where the gamma rays were being produced, finding that photons with energies greater than 10 MeV were created in a region stretching across about 180 m in the thundercloud. This suggests that the gamma rays are produced in a relatively small section of the much larger cloud. Furthermore, the 800 ms delay between the end of the gamma-ray pulse and the lightning flash suggests that the lightning is initiated some distance away from the acceleration – although the process that connects the two is still unknown. ......." .
A neutron star? You dont know what happens in a thundercloud 25 000 feet above your head and you pretend to know what happens 25 000 light-years far away in the center of the Galaxy??

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

God created also the distances

>

"........How can we revise these sets of equations in a way that can be reconciled with current observations while simultaneously accounting for the ability to see distant stars in only six-thousand years?........." [references]

The problem doesnt exist as Universe was created as it is. Light didnt travel million or billions of year in force of the fact it was just created along her path. 6000 years ago the light of Andromeda was just hitting planet earth. Because if God creates astronomical distances He can also fill them with light in the same true very instant of creation.

Comment of Robert Byers:


"......If the stars have a function then God would make them instantly useful and seeable........".

If we have to believe in the Saint Miracle of Big Bang when something popped out of nothing, why not to believe in an instant creation "ready to use"? God didnt create a single cell and then let her to manage herself through evolution, so God didnt create stars and then let them to wait some billions of years (time requested to light to travel between galaxies etc.)  in order to be visible one each other.

---------------REFERENCES:

Above excerpts coming from below article which completely misses the point of creation.

http://www.uncommondescent.com/creationism/distant-starlight-the-thorn-in-the-side-of-yec-can-there-be-a-middle-ground/

Distant Starlight, the thorn in the side of YEC — can there be a middle ground?



Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Footprints hidden by mainstream conspiracy source of information

>

Ask yourself why a digital tv channel like FOCUS specialized in scientific documentaries in Italy, linked to rationale magazine FOCUS, spreads documentaries on the UFO where openly the lies are affirmed like truth (Oak wood sighting, clearly UFO created by using remote controlled model helicopters with lights and flying in formation in order to give impression of a giant triangle in the sky ... "mile long starship").

And at the same time meanwhile aliens are enjoying the maximum of cover by media,  alternative or not, the below arguments are completely darkened also by the "mainstream counter-culture media" and by great part of conspiracy sources of information.

That betrays an hidden agenda of the manipulation of information (aliens, time-travels, Black holes travels, etc.) consisting in to present an universe "billion years old" and the life on planet "million years old" and generated in spontaneous way from mud. Genesis book Denial.

Assuming that aliens created life on earth it implies only to push the problem of creation of life away from earth and relocate it on another planet far away from the attention. 

IF ALIENS CREATED MAN (LIFE), WHO OR HOW HAVE BEEN CREATED ALIENs? DO THEY CREATE THEMSELVES?


Alien agenda has been developed in order to counter the definitive crack of the EVOLUTIONIST/ATHEIST AGENDA, it only hid the contradiction of the latter. If life is impossible to arise spontaneously on earth, for the same reason it is impossible to arise spontaneously from mud on every other planet of this universe:





Above image - "..The human footprint had been made first, and shortly thereafter (before the mud turned to stone), a dinosaur stepped in the mud with its middle toe stepping on top of the human track. You can actually see the displaced mud from the dinosaur's middle toe inside the human footprint..."  http://www.bible.ca/tracks/delk-track.htm





Religious anti-Biblical Science against ether theory [and against Proverbs 1:7]

>

"......The Einstein Hoax consists of maintaining the quasi-religious Theories of Relativity by saying that these theories can only be defined in terms of mathematics impossible to understand by mere mortals.  All of the essentials of a religion are present.  There is a deity in the form of Dr. Einstein.  The theory is protected by defenders of the faith who insure that heresy in any form is never published. ........".[REFERENCES]

Therefore you have to kill the other Science, the one agrreeing with Proverbs 1:7 :

".....In my opinion, there is a better theory called Aether Theory which explains our universe much better and does not create these common sense conundrums of Einstein’s Theories...  The interesting fact is that the history of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity is founded upon the older Aether theories of the 19th century.  These early scientists had very good reasons to reach the conclusions they did on the nature of matter and forces.  Unfortunately, the rise of some very good mathematicians and the lack of some explanations at the time led to the early 20th century conclusions and theories proposed by Einstein and his cohorts..................." [REFERENCES]

In fact destruction of ether theory means destruction of God's Kingdom:

".........When Blaise Pascal definitively declared the existence of a vacuum (a space with nothing in it) after his famous experiment in 1646, the Catholic Church was horrified. If there was a place where nothing exists, they feared, then there was a place where God didn’t rule, which therefore disallowed God the ability to be omnipotent. ........." [http://archives.realvail.com/RealRhetoric/382/Creationism-deadly-black-holes-911-conspiracies-global-warming-hoaxes-and-other-myths-Part-II.html]

Notice on how the bad reputation of Rome's church is always used as a label to destroy the theories they want to destroy. When no more useful that label is immediately hidden and  no one use them against the Vatican owned world science instututes (think only to universities, biological medical cennters, astronomical observatories etc.).

Pascal was a Roman Catholic Jansenist. Malignantly it can be said that the eradication of God with Pascal's experiments was secretly loved by Rome who now had an alibi for the existence of a God's 'vicarious' able to manage the will of God in his absence. If the modern newtonian void wiped away God's will from space it was only because it prepared the field for the Roman Catholic's pope "infallible will".... If void exist this means that "...God the same chose a vicarious to fill this material void, the pope of Rome"..... In perfect hegelian dialectic of the Jesuitism and of the Counter Reformation.

Contradictions of 'modern' science:

"....
  • Supporters will say that space is empty and curved "since no one can prove that it isn't".  How can "nothing" be curved??  If no one can prove otherwise, then doesn't that prove that ALL religions are true and exist?
  • Supporters will say that gravitational fields create energy from nothingness.  Doesn't this violate the Law of Conservation of Energy??
  • ·         Supporters will say that photons are massless particles with energy.  Doesn't this violate the equivalence of mass and energy E=Mc2??
  • Supporters will say that some invisible Dark Matter explains the missing gravitational mass of galaxies and explains the inexplicably fast galaxy spin.  They completely ignore the mass of radiation since of course it is massless.  Calculations show that the gravitational mass of the background radiation is easily sufficient to explain this galaxy spin speed.
  • Supporters will say that the actual passage of time changes as gravity increases.  How can the measurement itself became the reality and the identical clocks on earth and in space become completely disconnected in reality?  There are several thought experiments showing how ridiculous this is.
  • Supporters will say that the speed of light C is constant.  They completely ignore the impact of relativistic affects of gravity and velocity on their measuring instruments.  All their experiments prove is that C=C in their frame of reference.
......."[REFERENCES]

But all this contradictions are possible to hide thanks to mathematical manipulation. Dont forget that math is born in Babylon, Cush/Nimrod were labelled also as the "numberer" and the "builders of cities/walls" [see A. Hislop "the two babylons"].

-------------REFERENCES:

 http://nekengren.blogspot.it/2012/08/the-einstein-hoax-or-aether-theory.html





The Einstein Hoax OR Aether Theory

[10/23/2012 Note]
The USA Pioneer spacecraft is leaving our solar system and is slowing faster than expected due to gravity.  There are many proposed explanations which ignore the simple answer that our equations for gravity are still not correct.  Read below for more about Dark Matter and Gravity.

Einstein’s Theories of Relativity are universally accepted in science.    
·         Special Relativity (1905) says that all motion is relative and that there is no absolute state of rest.  The speed of light is the same for all observers.
·         General Relativity (1916) says that gravity is a geometric property of space and time.  The curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present.

The Einstein Hoax consists of maintaining the quasi-religious Theories of Relativity by saying that these theories can only be defined in terms of mathematics impossible to understand by mere mortals.  All of the essentials of a religion are present.  There is a deity in the form of Dr. Einstein.  The theory is protected by defenders of the faith who insure that heresy in any form is never published. 

In my opinion, there is a better theory called Aether Theory which explains our universe much better and does not create these common sense conundrums of Einstein’s Theories.  The interesting fact is that the history of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity is founded upon the older Aether theories of the 19th century.  These early scientists had very good reasons to reach the conclusions they did on the nature of matter and forces.  Unfortunately, the rise of some very good mathematicians and the lack of some explanations at the time led to the early 20th century conclusions and theories proposed by Einstein and his cohorts.

Einstein’s Theories of Relativity and Aether Theory both agree that:
  • The relativistic effects of Gravity and Velocity are equivalent.  This impacts the measured passage of time.  A spacecraft measures time faster than a person on the ground.
  • Gravity can produce collapsed objects.  These are often referred to as Black Holes.
Einstein’s Theories of Relativity say that space is empty.  There is no absolute velocity of any object because there is no frame of reference.  Einstein didn't need absolute velocity for his math to work.  However, even Einstein admitted that the non-existence of the Aether had not been proven.  

There are some common sense problems with the Einstein’s Theories of Relativity:
  • Supporters will say that space is empty and curved "since no one can prove that it isn't".  How can "nothing" be curved??  If no one can prove otherwise, then doesn't that prove that ALL religions are true and exist?
  • Supporters will say that gravitational fields create energy from nothingness.  Doesn't this violate the Law of Conservation of Energy??
  • ·         Supporters will say that photons are massless particles with energy.  Doesn't this violate the equivalence of mass and energy E=Mc2??
  • Supporters will say that some invisible Dark Matter explains the missing gravitational mass of galaxies and explains the inexplicably fast galaxy spin.  They completely ignore the mass of radiation since of course it is massless.  Calculations show that the gravitational mass of the background radiation is easily sufficient to explain this galaxy spin speed.
  • Supporters will say that the actual passage of time changes as gravity increases.  How can the measurement itself became the reality and the identical clocks on earth and in space become completely disconnected in reality?  There are several thought experiments showing how ridiculous this is.
  • Supporters will say that the speed of light C is constant.  They completely ignore the impact of relativistic affects of gravity and velocity on their measuring instruments.  All their experiments prove is that C=C in their frame of reference.
Aether Theory says that space is a solid.  It is not empty.  Emptiness does not exist.   Aether Theory verifies many experimental results better than the Theory of Relativity: 
·        --- The speed of light is always the same regardless of source velocity.  
o    Aether theory says that light travels through space as waves through a solid.  It is correct that the velocity of the source has no impact.  
o    Einstein’s Theories of Relativity says that light travels through space as physical packets of energy (photons).  It defies common sense to say that the velocity of these ballistic particles are not affected by the velocity of the source.
·        --- A magnet which is turned "on" will instantly attract distant metal objects.
o    Aether theory says that the magnetism is a stress on the physical Aether which we intuitively understand can propagate forces to distant objects.
o    Einstein’s Theories of Relativity says that some kind of tiny "force particle" is being instantly transmitted between objects.  Common sense particles "push" and don't "pull".  Also, if particles can't travel faster than light then how does the force apply instantly?  Going further to the subatomic level where various "force particles" are part of our Hoax, consistency requires that we abandon the idea that virtual particles named gluons carry forces within the nuclei of atoms. It is time to go back to the subatomic drawing board. 
·         ---Gravity produces a force on objects but the opposing force is not apparent.  The whole concept of gravity has defied reasonable explanation by Einstein’s Theories of Relativity.  
o    Aether theory says that matter (energy) modifies the  permeability of the Aether and produces a local reduction in the velocity of light.  In this sense, the gravitational field is actually a velocity well for light. This velocity well, in turn, allows an object within it to shed some of its internal energy by moving to a lower elevation. It does this by pushing itself downward against the Aether. This push, which we cannot directly observe, is the fictitious force of gravity currently described in texts. We can only observe the equal and opposite reaction to this fictitious force required by Newton's Second Law of Motion (for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction) as the force of gravity. 
o    Einstein’s Theories of Relativity says that curved space produces the effect of gravity.  There are fundamental conservation of energy issues with this view.
·         ---Quantum Electrodynamics describes how light and matter interact via Quantum Fields. It is called "the jewel of physics" for its extremely accurate predictions and experimental confirmations. 
o    Aether theory says that the continuous Quantum Field propagating at infinite velocity is consistent with our solid Aether.
o    Einstein’s Theories of Relativity cannot explain Quantum Electrodynamics




Aether Theory provides answers to some important questions: 
·         ---How can a clock on the Earth measure time differently than a clock travelling on a rocket?
o    Aether theory says that all measuring instruments change calibration depending on gravity and velocity. 
o    Einstein’s Theories of Relativity says that time itself changes in both cases.  There are many thought experiments which can show how ridiculous this is.
·         ---What is the nature of fundamental particles?  How does solid matter move effortlessly through the solid Aether? 
o    Aether theory says that matter isn't solid!!  Experiments show that electrons and nucleons contain no detectable solid structure larger than the observational limit of  10-18  meters.  The only two stable fundamental particles, electrons and protons, are in reality, just closed loops of radiation.  An electron has one closed loop and the proton has 3 intertwined closed loops (the 3 supposed fundamental Quarks).  The math shows that the particle perceived radius is consistent with it's known energy content and is consistent with its behavior within atoms.  To an observer, loops of vibration appear to be a material particles.  
o    Aether theory says that the short lived high energy particles created in nuclear explosions and collision experiments are consistent with this interpretation.  We would expect such particles to be unstable and to decay rapidly.  Particle physics experiments involving large energies may be about as meaningful in determining the nature of matter as an experiment which attempts to determine the nature of fine crystal goblets by shattering them with rifle bullets and studying the fragments while they are in flight.
o    Einstein’s Theories of Relativity keep creating ever more fundamental particles.  This defies common sense and the more expected fundamental simplicity of nature.
·      
·       ---What is the Unified Field Theory?  Is there a “theory of everything” as coined by Einstein?  Is there a single equation uniting the four standard forces of Strong Nuclear, Weak Nuclear, Electromagnetism, and Gravity?
o    Aether theory and the concept that matter consists of loops of radiation yields a simple matrix of equations for Electromagnetism and Gravity.  The Strong Nuclear and Weak Nuclear forces of the Standard Model do not exist.
o    Einstein’s Theories of Relativity have been massaged into complicated math with multiple dimensions to create equations that still don’t incorporate Gravity.





Posted by












The Science Fraud

>

Black holes and relativity necessary to create a billion years old universe with which to crush the Genesis' 6000 years truth?

History of science polluted by the secret anti-Biblical agenda?

Is 'modern' science only a "scientific" method to create frauds?

Give a look to a discussion about the the "Black holes fraud" and you perceive how much the polemic expand on a very fragmented field of technical arguments and counter-arguments. You immediately perceive that this 'modern' stand of science is the perfect achademic intellectual condition where a scientist can, with help of mathematical manipulation, create his (of his masters or of his cultural heritage) personal view of the universe. It is an absolute ascertainment that since 150 years a perfect scientifical system of  "sticks and carrots" lead science on the one-way-anti-Biblical direction.

Also mathematic is an opinion and this is verified directly at higher mathematical level thanks Kurt Goedel. This means that also mathematic is the creation of a Will.

Black holes and scientific fraud



Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com
Black holes and scientific fraud

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=123802


'Modern' Science is born on the denial of Proverbs 1:7 therefore it is in her DNA the continuous search for a denial of God.


Black holes and scientific fraud



Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com

Sunday, November 10, 2013